2005 · Week 12

Final

Browns

Cleveland

QB Trent Dilfer

12·24

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brad Johnson

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

MIN -3.5

Total

40

Model margin

+5.2est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Browns

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsBrowns wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Brownsedge mapVikings
  • -0.131EPA / play-0.074
  • 39.5%Success rate40.6%
  • -0.097EPA / dropback-0.009
  • -0.183EPA / rush-0.185
  • 7.4%Explosive rate7.1%
  • 32.4%Third-down rate33.7%
  • 38.1%Red-zone TD rate48.7%
  • 1.22Points / drive1.46
  • 3.1%Turnover rate2.7%
  • -0.004EPA / play allowed-0.028

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 4–2 since 1999

Meetings average 42.7 points. MIN are 4-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W5MIN @ CLE2117MIN
2021 · W4CLE @ MIN147CLE
2017 · W8MIN @ CLE3316MIN
2013 · W3CLE @ MIN3127CLE
2009 · W1MIN @ CLE3420MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Browns

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Trent Dilfer23/3521412
Charlie Frye0/1001

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Reuben Droughns19733.80
Trent Dilfer155.00

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson19/2820731

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Mewelde Moore21673.20
Ciatrick Fason3144.70
Travis Taylor155.00
Brad Johnson3-2-0.70
Michael Bennett3-3-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +3.53.5%6.4%7.4%3.2%4.9%3.3%3.0%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Browns.

Half-point at risk

2.54%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

62.9%

Expected total

42.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.72
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin+5.20