2008 · Week 9

Final

Texans

Houston

QB Matt Schaub

21·28

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Gus Frerotte

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

MIN -6.5

Total

46.5

Model margin

+4.6est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Texans

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsTexans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Texansedge mapVikings
  • +0.037EPA / play-0.039
  • 45.3%Success rate40.9%
  • +0.069EPA / dropback+0.001
  • -0.012EPA / rush-0.081
  • 9.6%Explosive rate9.0%
  • +3.93CPOE-2.18
  • 42.2%Third-down rate39.7%
  • 52.0%Red-zone TD rate53.5%
  • 1.91Points / drive1.59
  • 2.9%Turnover rate2.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 6–0 since 1999

MIN have won 6 straight. Meetings average 46.5 points. MIN are 6-0 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W3HOU @ MIN734MIN
2020 · W4MIN @ HOU3123MIN
2016 · W5HOU @ MIN1331MIN
2012 · W16MIN @ HOU236MIN
2004 · W5MIN @ HOU3428MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Texans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Sage Rosenfels21/2922421
Matt Schaub11/1613901

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Steve Slaton16623.90

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Gus Frerotte11/1818231

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson251395.61
Chester Taylor7385.40
Gus Frerotte300.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +6.53.6%6.5%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Texans.

Half-point at risk

4.91%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

61.3%

Expected total

44.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.53
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.56
  • Expected margin+4.57