2004 · Week 5

Final / OT

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Daunte Culpepper

34·28

Texans

Houston

QB David Carr

Reliant Stadium · open · grass

Closing spread

MIN -3.5

Total

50

Model margin

+1.7est.

HOU perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Texans
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Texans winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapTexans
  • +0.162EPA / play-0.022
  • 50.0%Success rate41.4%
  • +0.287EPA / dropback+0.060
  • -0.097EPA / rush-0.134
  • 10.7%Explosive rate8.3%
  • 52.5%Third-down rate38.7%
  • 64.5%Red-zone TD rate65.1%
  • 2.26Points / drive1.44
  • 2.0%Turnover rate2.3%
  • +0.107EPA / play allowed-0.004

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 6–0 since 1999

MIN have won 6 straight. Meetings average 46.5 points. HOU are 0-6 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W3HOU @ MIN734MIN
2020 · W4MIN @ HOU3123MIN
2016 · W5HOU @ MIN1331MIN
2012 · W16MIN @ HOU236MIN
2008 · W9HOU @ MIN2128MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daunte Culpepper36/5039650

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Mewelde Moore20924.60
Daunte Culpepper6305.00

Texans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
David Carr27/4337230

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Domanick Williams14312.21
David Carr3217.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -3.54.1%2.8%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Texans; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

7.13%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

53.5%

Expected total

46.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.34
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.56
  • Expected margin+1.66