2012 · Week 3

Final

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Andy Dalton

38·31

Commanders

Washington

QB Robert Griffin

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 65°F · wind 6mph

Closing spread

WAS -3

Total

49.5

Model margin

+3.0est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Availability

The injury report

The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.

Bengals

Commanders

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Bengals

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsBengals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bengalsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.002EPA / play+0.137
  • 41.6%Success rate46.7%
  • +0.019EPA / dropback+0.233
  • -0.034EPA / rush+0.030
  • 6.6%Explosive rate12.8%
  • +1.17CPOE+4.84
  • 34.3%Third-down rate35.5%
  • 55.7%Red-zone TD rate67.7%
  • 1.71Points / drive2.11
  • 2.4%Turnover rate1.4%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CIN lead 3–2–1 since 1999

WAS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 47.2 points. WAS are 3-3 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W3WAS @ CIN38–33WAS
2020 · W11CIN @ WAS9–20WAS
2016 · W8WAS @ CIN27–27Tie
2008 · W15WAS @ CIN13–20CIN
2004 · W10CIN @ WAS17–10CIN

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultCIN–WAS
CINQ1 15:00173Touchdown7–0
WASQ1 14:43524Punt7–0
CINQ1 11:4521Opp touchdown7–7
CINQ1 11:00832Punt7–7
WASQ1 7:1233Punt7–7
CINQ1 5:40668Touchdown14–7
WASQ1 3:28416Punt14–7
CINQ1 1:041568Turnover on downs14–7
WASQ2 9:2943Punt14–7
CINQ2 7:51630Field goal17–7
WASQ2 4:362-8Turnover17–7
CINQ2 3:49212Touchdown24–7
WASQ2 3:13730Field goal24–10
CINQ2 0:3100End of half24–10
WASQ3 15:00965Touchdown24–17
CINQ3 10:2339Punt24–17
WASQ3 8:571081Touchdown24–24
CINQ3 3:29227Turnover24–24
WASQ3 2:533-8Punt24–24
CINQ3 1:4136Punt24–24
WASQ3 0:0439Punt24–24
CINQ4 13:27573Touchdown31–24
WASQ4 11:24517Punt31–24
CINQ4 9:09472Touchdown38–24
WASQ4 7:0813100Touchdown38–31
CINQ4 3:3538Punt38–31
CINQ4 1:5700Punt38–31
CINQ4 1:5700Punt38–31
WASQ4 1:47445End of half38–31
WASQ4 0:3624End of half38–31
WASQ4 0:0700End of half38–31
WASQ4 0:0710End of half38–31
WASQ4 0:0000End of half38–31

Box score

Individual performances

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Andy Dalton19/2732831
Mohamed Sanu1/17310

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
BenJarvus Green-Ellis17382.21
Brian Leonard2189.00
Andrew Hawkins2168.00
Andy Dalton2168.00
A.J. Green11111.00
Bernard Scott3-5-1.70

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Robert Griffin III21/3422110

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Alfred Morris17784.61
Robert Griffin III13745.71
Brandon Banks3299.70
Evan Royster22110.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +33.9%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Bengals.

Half-point at risk

7.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.0%

Expected total

45.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.48
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.97