2012 · Week 9

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

51·20

Titans

Tennessee

QB Matt Hasselbeck

LP Field · outdoors · grass · 50°F · wind 6mph

Closing spread

CHI -4.5

Total

44

Model margin

-0.0est.

TEN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Titans
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Titans winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapTitans
  • -0.041EPA / play-0.093
  • 39.6%Success rate38.0%
  • +0.005EPA / dropback-0.054
  • -0.104EPA / rush-0.166
  • 8.0%Explosive rate8.2%
  • -0.76CPOE-2.87
  • 36.4%Third-down rate38.2%
  • 60.1%Red-zone TD rate55.5%
  • 1.47Points / drive1.29
  • 2.3%Turnover rate2.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 3–3 since 1999

Meetings average 45.3 points. TEN are 2-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W1TEN @ CHI1724CHI
2020 · W9CHI @ TEN1724TEN
2016 · W12TEN @ CHI2721TEN
2008 · W10TEN @ CHI2114TEN
2004 · W10CHI @ TEN1917CHI

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler19/2622930

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte121038.61
Armando Allen10323.20
Michael Bush10161.60
Jay Cutler11212.00
Jason Campbell3-3-1.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Brandon Marshall9101223
Matt Forte22450
Earl Bennett48220
Devin Hester22190
Michael Bush11170
Eric Weems0100
Evan Rodriguez0100

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck20/3520011

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Johnson161418.81
Matt Hasselbeck2189.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -4.52.7%4.4%2.9%7.4%7.4%2.9%4.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

2.45%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

49.1%

Expected total

41.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.07
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment-0.43
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-0.01