2004 · Week 10

Final / OT

Bears

Chicago

QB Craig Krenzel

19·17

Titans

Tennessee

QB Billy Volek

The Coliseum · outdoors · grass · 56°F · wind 9mph

Closing spread

TEN -5.5

Total

34

Model margin

+6.9est.

TEN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Titans
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Titans winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapTitans
  • -0.240EPA / play-0.012
  • 35.2%Success rate41.5%
  • -0.283EPA / dropback+0.035
  • -0.177EPA / rush-0.091
  • 6.8%Explosive rate8.8%
  • 25.7%Third-down rate34.6%
  • 43.9%Red-zone TD rate61.4%
  • 0.78Points / drive1.47
  • 3.4%Turnover rate2.8%
  • -0.102EPA / play allowed+0.076

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 3–3 since 1999

Meetings average 45.3 points. TEN are 2-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W1TEN @ CHI1724CHI
2020 · W9CHI @ TEN1724TEN
2016 · W12TEN @ CHI2721TEN
2012 · W9CHI @ TEN5120CHI
2008 · W10TEN @ CHI2114TEN

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Craig Krenzel10/2811602

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Anthony Thomas29722.50
Bobby Wade3217.00
Craig Krenzel199.00
Bernard Berrian1-1-1.00

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Billy Volek27/4433421

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Brown20623.10
Billy Volek155.00
Antowain Smith242.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +5.53.1%5.9%7.3%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.2%2.6%

Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

3.20%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

67.1%

Expected total

44.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.73
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+3.01
  • Rest differential+0.56
  • Expected margin+6.86