Closing spread
TEN -2.5
Total
42
Model margin
-0.3est.
ARI perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Titans
- OutDerrick MorganLBKnee· DNP
Cardinals
- OutAdrian PetersonRBNeck· DNP
- OutJohn BrownWRToe· DNP
- QuestionableCorey PetersDTAnkle· Limited
- QuestionableJ.J. NelsonWRKnee· Limited
- QuestionableJared VeldheerTElbow· Limited
- QuestionableJosh MauroDTAnkle· Limited
- QuestionablePatrick PetersonCBHamstring· Limited
- DNPRudy FordSKnee
Win probability
- Cardinals
- Titans
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.069EPA / play-0.129
- 42.6%Success rate38.8%
- -0.057EPA / dropback-0.086
- -0.086EPA / rush-0.207
- 7.7%Explosive rate7.2%
- +0.43CPOE-4.25
- 36.0%Third-down rate35.7%
- 61.4%Red-zone TD rate52.2%
- 1.73Points / drive1.20
- 2.4%Turnover rate2.3%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
ARI lead 4–2 since 1999
Meetings average 41.8 points. ARI are 4-1-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | TEN–ARI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN | Q1 15:00 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| ARI | Q1 13:26 | 8 | 21 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 8:25 | 7 | 34 | Punt | 0–0 |
| ARI | Q1 3:43 | 3 | -5 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 2:17 | 7 | 22 | Punt | 0–0 |
| ARI | Q2 14:03 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q2 12:18 | 10 | 45 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| ARI | Q2 7:16 | 8 | 29 | Punt | 7–0 |
| TEN | Q2 3:06 | 4 | -1 | Punt | 7–0 |
| ARI | Q2 1:49 | 5 | 14 | Punt | 7–0 |
| TEN | Q2 0:49 | 6 | 44 | Missed field goal | 7–0 |
| ARI | Q3 15:00 | 8 | 48 | Field goal | 7–3 |
| TEN | Q3 9:36 | 4 | 9 | Turnover on downs | 7–3 |
| ARI | Q3 7:25 | 5 | 25 | Field goal | 7–6 |
| TEN | Q3 4:44 | 6 | 40 | Turnover | 7–6 |
| ARI | Q3 1:45 | 9 | 72 | Missed field goal | 7–6 |
| TEN | Q4 12:04 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 7–6 |
| ARI | Q4 9:59 | 8 | 66 | Field goal | 7–9 |
| TEN | Q4 5:59 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 7–9 |
| ARI | Q4 5:48 | 3 | -10 | Field goal | 7–12 |
| TEN | Q4 3:45 | 6 | 4 | Punt | 7–12 |
| ARI | Q4 2:00 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 7–12 |
| TEN | Q4 1:27 | 4 | 0 | Turnover on downs | 7–12 |
| ARI | Q4 1:05 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 7–12 |
Box score
Individual performances
Titans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcus Mariota | 16/31 | 159 | 0 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeMarco Murray | 11 | 34 | 3.1 | 0 |
| Derrick Henry | 8 | 20 | 2.5 | 1 |
| Marcus Mariota | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 |
| Eric Weems | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric Decker | 3 | 5 | 56 | 0 |
| Delanie Walker | 5 | 9 | 42 | 0 |
| Corey Davis | 3 | 6 | 29 | 0 |
| Rishard Matthews | 3 | 5 | 19 | 0 |
| DeMarco Murray | 2 | 3 | 13 | 0 |
| Phillip Supernaw | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Taywan Taylor | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Cardinals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blaine Gabbert | 17/26 | 178 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerwynn Williams | 20 | 73 | 3.6 | 0 |
| Chad Williams | 1 | 33 | 33.0 | 0 |
| Blaine Gabbert | 4 | 12 | 3.0 | 0 |
| D.J. Foster | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larry Fitzgerald | 5 | 7 | 44 | 0 |
| Jermaine Gresham | 2 | 2 | 27 | 0 |
| J.J. Nelson | 2 | 3 | 26 | 0 |
| Ricky Seals-Jones | 1 | 3 | 20 | 0 |
| Kerwynn Williams | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 |
| Jaron Brown | 2 | 5 | 15 | 0 |
| Troy Niklas | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| D.J. Foster | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Titans.
Half-point at risk
2.12%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
48.3%
Expected total
41.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.95
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment-2.97
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-0.28



