2021 · Week 14

Final

Giants

New York

QB Mike Glennon

21·37

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Justin Herbert

SoFi Stadium · dome · matrixturf

Closing spread

LAC -9.5

Total

44

Model margin

+11.2est.

LAC perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Giants

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsGiants wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Giantsedge mapChargers
  • -0.141EPA / play+0.088
  • 40.2%Success rate47.4%
  • -0.146EPA / dropback+0.167
  • -0.133EPA / rush-0.075
  • 5.7%Explosive rate7.5%
  • -4.62CPOE-0.71
  • 35.9%Third-down rate45.7%
  • 47.5%Red-zone TD rate68.6%
  • 1.20Points / drive2.55
  • 2.8%Turnover rate1.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LAC lead 5–1 since 1999

Meetings average 51 points. LAC are 5-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W4LAC @ NYG1821NYG
2017 · W5LAC @ NYG2722CHARGERS
2013 · W14NYG @ SD1437CHARGERS
2009 · W9SD @ NYG2120CHARGERS
2005 · W3NYG @ SD2345CHARGERS

Box score

Individual performances

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mike Glennon17/3619121

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Saquon Barkley16644.00
Devontae Booker8567.00
Mike Glennon177.01

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Justin Herbert23/3127530

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Austin Ekeler12675.61
Justin Jackson9353.90
Joshua Kelley10333.30
Justin Herbert4194.80
Chase Daniel2-2-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +9.54.6%6.4%2.3%3.0%4.8%3.5%3.6%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Giants.

Half-point at risk

3.46%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

77.1%

Expected total

43.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+4.36
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment+5.15
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+11.21