1999 · Week 2

Final

Raiders

Oakland

QB Rich Gannon

22·17

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Randall Cunningham

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

MIN -11

Total

47.5

Model margin

-0.9est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

1.2%est.

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Raiders

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsRaiders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

MIN lead 4–3 since 1999

MIN have won 3 straight. Meetings average 39.9 points. MIN are 3-3-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W14MIN @ LV3–0MIN
2019 · W3OAK @ MIN14–34MIN
2015 · W10MIN @ OAK30–14MIN
2011 · W11OAK @ MIN27–21RAIDERS
2007 · W11OAK @ MIN22–29MIN
2003 · W11MIN @ OAK18–28RAIDERS

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultOAK–MIN
MINQ1 15:00944Missed field goal0–0
LVQ1 9:5531Punt0–0
MINQ1 8:19773Touchdown0–7
LVQ1 5:0338Punt0–7
MINQ1 3:19648Turnover0–7
LVQ1 0:38952Field goal3–7
MINQ2 11:34858Field goal3–10
LVQ2 8:1637Punt3–10
MINQ2 6:31629Missed field goal3–10
LVQ2 2:46825Field goal6–10
MINQ2 0:3614End of half6–10
LVQ3 15:00985Touchdown13–10
MINQ3 8:5520Turnover13–10
LVQ3 8:3746Field goal16–10
MINQ3 7:013-5Punt16–10
LVQ3 5:22764Touchdown22–10
MINQ3 1:08750Touchdown22–17
LVQ4 14:06549Punt22–17
MINQ4 12:0332Punt22–17
LVQ4 11:10627Punt22–17
MINQ4 9:05653Turnover on downs22–17
LVQ4 7:23637Turnover22–17
MINQ4 3:403-2Punt22–17
LVQ4 2:20641Punt22–17
MINQ4 0:0810Turnover22–17

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Randall Cunningham23/3936422

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Robert Smith11242.20
Randy Moss11111.00
Randall Cunningham100.00
Leroy Hoard2-1-0.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +117.4%7.2%2.8%4.3%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Raiders.

Half-point at risk

1.20%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

46.6%

Expected total

44.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.93
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-4.40
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-0.91

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.