2015 · Week 10

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Teddy Bridgewater

30·14

Raiders

Oakland

QB Derek Carr

O.co Coliseum · outdoors · grass · 62°F · wind 31mph

Closing spread

OAK -3

Total

44

Model margin

+1.6est.

OAK perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Availability

The injury report

The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.

Vikings

Raiders

Win probability

  • Raiders
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Raiders winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

MIN lead 4–3 since 1999

MIN have won 3 straight. Meetings average 39.9 points. OAK are 3-3-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W14MIN @ LV3–0MIN
2019 · W3OAK @ MIN14–34MIN
2011 · W11OAK @ MIN27–21RAIDERS
2007 · W11OAK @ MIN22–29MIN
2003 · W11MIN @ OAK18–28RAIDERS
1999 · W2OAK @ MIN22–17RAIDERS

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultMIN–OAK
MINQ1 15:00948Touchdown7–0
LVQ1 10:5934Punt7–0
MINQ1 9:20815Punt7–0
LVQ1 5:14415Turnover7–0
MINQ1 3:49539Field goal10–0
LVQ1 1:32310Punt10–0
MINQ2 14:52753Field goal13–0
LVQ2 10:33968Touchdown13–7
MINQ2 5:544-9Punt13–7
LVQ2 3:21474Touchdown19–14
MINQ2 1:5200Touchdown20–14
LVQ2 1:3933Punt20–14
MINQ2 0:49417Missed field goal20–14
LVQ3 15:00929Punt20–14
MINQ3 10:03619Punt20–14
LVQ3 6:22821Punt20–14
MINQ3 1:01960Missed field goal20–14
LVQ4 10:5336Punt20–14
MINQ4 9:31963Field goal23–14
LVQ4 3:50868Turnover29–14
MINQ4 2:03180Touchdown30–14
LVQ4 1:501073End of half30–14

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Teddy Bridgewater14/2214010

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson262037.81
Teddy Bridgewater22311.50
Adam Thielen11414.00
Stefon Diggs11010.00
Matt Asiata273.50
Cordarrelle Patterson166.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +34.1%2.8%7.1%7.5%3.0%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Raiders; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

7.48%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

53.5%

Expected total

44.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.85
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.64

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.