2007 · Week 11

Final

Raiders

Oakland

QB Daunte Culpepper

22·29

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Tarvaris Jackson

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

MIN -4.5

Total

35

Model margin

+3.6est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Raiders

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsRaiders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

MIN lead 4–3 since 1999

MIN have won 3 straight. Meetings average 39.9 points. MIN are 3-3-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W14MIN @ LV3–0MIN
2019 · W3OAK @ MIN14–34MIN
2015 · W10MIN @ OAK30–14MIN
2011 · W11OAK @ MIN27–21RAIDERS
2003 · W11MIN @ OAK18–28RAIDERS
1999 · W2OAK @ MIN22–17RAIDERS

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultOAK–MIN
MINQ1 15:00289Touchdown0–7
LVQ1 14:1135Punt0–7
MINQ1 12:43538Turnover0–7
LVQ1 9:5133Safety0–9
MINQ1 8:3026Turnover0–9
LVQ1 7:31529Field goal3–9
MINQ1 4:45861Field goal3–12
LVQ2 14:56570Touchdown10–12
MINQ2 12:571-5Turnover10–12
LVQ2 12:4447Field goal13–12
MINQ2 11:18464Touchdown13–19
LVQ2 9:1733Punt13–19
MINQ2 7:20519Punt13–19
LVQ2 4:35844Field goal16–19
MINQ2 1:42519Turnover16–19
LVQ2 0:46415Field goal19–19
LVQ3 15:00723Punt19–19
MINQ3 10:57548Field goal19–22
LVQ3 8:23534Punt19–22
MINQ3 5:463-1Punt19–22
LVQ3 4:32324Turnover19–22
MINQ3 2:44674Touchdown19–29
LVQ4 14:52611Punt19–29
MINQ4 10:55944Punt19–29
LVQ4 5:22658Field goal22–29
MINQ4 3:23522Punt22–29
LVQ4 1:5510Turnover22–29
LVQ4 1:461046End of half22–29

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tarvaris Jackson17/2217101
Sidney Rice2/29400

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chester Taylor221647.53
Troy Williamson12626.00
Tarvaris Jackson3196.30
Mewelde Moore294.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +4.53.8%6.8%7.5%3.2%4.8%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Raiders.

Half-point at risk

1.96%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

58.6%

Expected total

43.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.01
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.57

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.