1999 · Week 9

Final

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Jeff Blake

20·37

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Jon Kitna

Seattle Kingdome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

SEA -14

Total

40

Model margin

+2.9est.

SEA perspective

Push chance

2.7%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Seahawks
  • Bengals

How each play moved the game.

Seahawks winsBengals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bengalsedge mapSeahawks
  • -0.068EPA / play-0.070
  • 39.4%Success rate39.0%
  • -0.034EPA / dropback+0.010
  • -0.132EPA / rush-0.193
  • 7.1%Explosive rate8.7%
  • 39.2%Third-down rate33.0%
  • 43.1%Red-zone TD rate48.6%
  • 1.24Points / drive1.40
  • 2.4%Turnover rate3.0%
  • +0.041EPA / play allowed-0.076

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CIN lead 4–3 since 1999

Meetings average 45.9 points. SEA are 1-5-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W6SEA @ CIN1317CIN
2019 · W1CIN @ SEA2021SEA
2015 · W5SEA @ CIN2427CIN
2011 · W8CIN @ SEA3412CIN
2007 · W3CIN @ SEA2124SEA
2003 · W8SEA @ CIN2427CIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jeff Blake18/3528712
Scott Covington2/31500

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Corey Dillon16815.10
Jeff Blake5346.81
Michael Basnight111.00
Craig Yeast1-13-13.00

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jon Kitna14/2420232

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ricky Watters271334.91
Ahman Green9404.40
Jon Kitna100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +147.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Seahawks; negative favour Bengals.

Half-point at risk

2.71%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.0%

Expected total

44.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.46
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin+2.94