2003 · Week 8

Final

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Matt Hasselbeck

24·27

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Jon Kitna

Paul Brown Stadium · outdoors · grass · 49°F · wind 5mph

Closing spread

SEA -3

Total

41.5

Model margin

+0.8est.

CIN perspective

Push chance

7.3%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Bengals
  • Seahawks

How each play moved the game.

Bengals winsSeahawks wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Seahawksedge mapBengals
  • +0.070EPA / play+0.049
  • 46.1%Success rate43.9%
  • +0.148EPA / dropback+0.126
  • -0.039EPA / rush-0.053
  • 10.5%Explosive rate7.6%
  • 46.8%Third-down rate44.6%
  • 68.2%Red-zone TD rate62.0%
  • 1.98Points / drive1.83
  • 2.4%Turnover rate1.9%
  • -0.012EPA / play allowed+0.077

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CIN lead 4–3 since 1999

Meetings average 45.9 points. CIN are 5-1-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W6SEA @ CIN1317CIN
2019 · W1CIN @ SEA2021SEA
2015 · W5SEA @ CIN2427CIN
2011 · W8CIN @ SEA3412CIN
2007 · W3CIN @ SEA2124SEA
1999 · W9CIN @ SEA2037SEA

Box score

Individual performances

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck26/4334733

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Shaun Alexander20864.30
Maurice Morris3248.00
Matt Hasselbeck11111.00

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jon Kitna19/3124020

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Rudi Johnson271013.71
Peter Warrick15050.00
Jon Kitna3279.00
Brandon Bennett1-1-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -34.3%2.9%7.3%7.4%3.0%4.5%2.8%

Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Seahawks.

Half-point at risk

7.26%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.1%

Expected total

46.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.81
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.75