2007 · Week 3

Final

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Carson Palmer

21·24

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Matt Hasselbeck

Qwest Field · outdoors · fieldturf · 54°F · wind 0mph

Closing spread

SEA -3.5

Total

49.5

Model margin

+3.8est.

SEA perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Seahawks
  • Bengals

How each play moved the game.

Seahawks winsBengals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bengalsedge mapSeahawks
  • +0.024EPA / play+0.006
  • 46.0%Success rate45.1%
  • +0.100EPA / dropback+0.107
  • -0.091EPA / rush-0.158
  • 7.9%Explosive rate8.8%
  • +5.31CPOE+2.40
  • 45.6%Third-down rate35.7%
  • 51.6%Red-zone TD rate61.2%
  • 1.86Points / drive1.77
  • 2.6%Turnover rate2.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CIN lead 4–3 since 1999

Meetings average 45.9 points. SEA are 1-5-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W6SEA @ CIN1317CIN
2019 · W1CIN @ SEA2021SEA
2015 · W5SEA @ CIN2427CIN
2011 · W8CIN @ SEA3412CIN
2003 · W8SEA @ CIN2427CIN
1999 · W9CIN @ SEA2037SEA

Box score

Individual performances

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer27/4334212

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Kenny Watson9606.71
Rudi Johnson1790.50
T.J. Houshmandzadeh133.00
Skyler Green111.00
Carson Palmer1-1-1.00

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck24/3724832

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Shaun Alexander211004.80
Matt Hasselbeck3-1-0.30

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +3.53.7%6.7%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Seahawks; negative favour Bengals.

Half-point at risk

2.55%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

59.3%

Expected total

43.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.25
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.81