Closing spread
MIA -10.5
Total
37
Model margin
+5.4est.
MIA perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Dolphins
- Bears
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.129EPA / play+0.017
- 40.0%Success rate45.0%
- -0.089EPA / dropback+0.060
- -0.197EPA / rush-0.028
- 7.5%Explosive rate11.0%
- 33.7%Third-down rate37.0%
- 64.5%Red-zone TD rate65.1%
- 1.35Points / drive1.85
- 3.2%Turnover rate2.9%
- -0.001EPA / play allowed-0.083
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
MIA lead 5–1 since 1999
MIA have won 3 straight. Meetings average 43.8 points. MIA are 4-2 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CHI–MIA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| MIA | Q1 12:52 | 6 | 60 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 9:38 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| MIA | Q1 9:31 | 4 | 38 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| CHI | Q1 7:30 | 6 | 20 | Punt | 0–7 |
| MIA | Q1 4:12 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 0–7 |
| CHI | Q1 2:16 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 0–7 |
| MIA | Q1 0:56 | 8 | 55 | Turnover | 0–7 |
| CHI | Q2 13:21 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 0–7 |
| MIA | Q2 12:14 | 6 | 18 | Punt | 0–7 |
| CHI | Q2 9:13 | 4 | 1 | Punt | 0–7 |
| MIA | Q2 7:26 | 7 | 84 | Touchdown | 0–14 |
| CHI | Q2 4:12 | 6 | 11 | Punt | 0–14 |
| MIA | Q2 1:45 | 7 | 39 | End of half | 0–14 |
| MIA | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 37 | Turnover | 0–14 |
| CHI | Q3 11:09 | 3 | 2 | Field goal | 3–14 |
| MIA | Q3 10:15 | 2 | 65 | Touchdown | 3–21 |
| CHI | Q3 9:16 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 3–21 |
| MIA | Q3 7:36 | 5 | 11 | Punt | 3–21 |
| CHI | Q3 4:37 | 13 | 69 | Turnover on downs | 3–21 |
| MIA | Q4 14:00 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 3–21 |
| CHI | Q4 12:16 | 5 | 12 | Turnover on downs | 3–21 |
| MIA | Q4 11:09 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 3–21 |
| CHI | Q4 9:21 | 2 | 0 | Turnover | 3–21 |
| MIA | Q4 9:05 | 3 | 5 | Field goal | 3–24 |
| CHI | Q4 7:26 | 1 | -6 | Turnover | 3–24 |
| MIA | Q4 7:12 | 3 | 7 | Field goal | 3–27 |
| CHI | Q4 5:41 | 3 | 20 | Turnover | 3–27 |
| MIA | Q4 4:51 | 7 | 7 | Turnover on downs | 3–27 |
| CHI | Q4 2:10 | 6 | 58 | Touchdown | 9–27 |
| MIA | Q4 0:44 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 9–27 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Chandler | 7/17 | 86 | 0 | 2 |
| Jim Miller | 3/12 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Henry Burris | 1/3 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henry Burris | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 0 |
| Leon Johnson | 15 | 44 | 2.9 | 0 |
| Adrian Peterson | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 0 |
| Jim Miller | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marty Booker | 5 | 11 | 46 | 1 |
| John Gilmore | 2 | 5 | 24 | 0 |
| Ahmad Merritt | 1 | 3 | 11 | 0 |
| Leon Johnson | 1 | 2 | 9 | 0 |
| Adrian Peterson | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Dez White | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 |
| Stanley Pritchett | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Marcus Robinson | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Dolphins
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Fiedler | 15/29 | 196 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricky Williams | 31 | 216 | 7.0 | 2 |
| Travis Minor | 8 | 21 | 2.6 | 0 |
| Jay Fiedler | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 |
| James McKnight | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 |
| Sage Rosenfels | 2 | -9 | -4.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James McKnight | 4 | 5 | 90 | 0 |
| Chris Chambers | 2 | 6 | 34 | 0 |
| Randy McMichael | 1 | 2 | 26 | 0 |
| Cris Carter | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
| Dedric Ward | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
| Jed Weaver | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| Ricky Williams | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Dolphins; negative favour Bears.
Half-point at risk
1.58%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
63.5%
Expected total
44.4est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.88
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+5.44



