Closing spread
DEN -10.5
Total
38.5
Model margin
+0.9est.
DEN perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Broncos
- Bears
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.100EPA / play+0.045
- 38.3%Success rate44.6%
- -0.156EPA / dropback+0.043
- -0.016EPA / rush+0.047
- 7.4%Explosive rate8.6%
- 33.9%Third-down rate39.9%
- 54.5%Red-zone TD rate57.7%
- 1.44Points / drive1.96
- 2.6%Turnover rate2.0%
- -0.013EPA / play allowed-0.073
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
All square 3–3 since 1999
Meetings average 40.7 points. DEN are 1-4-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CHI–DEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 14 | Punt | 0–0 |
| DEN | Q1 11:30 | 13 | 73 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| CHI | Q1 3:59 | 5 | 30 | Field goal | 3–7 |
| DEN | Q1 1:31 | 7 | 19 | Punt | 3–7 |
| CHI | Q2 13:35 | 8 | 19 | Punt | 3–7 |
| DEN | Q2 9:40 | 6 | 74 | Missed field goal | 3–7 |
| CHI | Q2 5:28 | 7 | 24 | Field goal | 6–7 |
| DEN | Q2 1:57 | 4 | 16 | Punt | 6–7 |
| CHI | Q2 0:57 | 5 | 30 | Field goal | 9–7 |
| DEN | Q2 0:03 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 9–7 |
| DEN | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 73 | Field goal | 9–10 |
| CHI | Q3 11:41 | 7 | 16 | Punt | 9–10 |
| DEN | Q3 8:01 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 9–10 |
| CHI | Q3 6:23 | 15 | 55 | Touchdown | 16–10 |
| DEN | Q4 12:45 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 16–10 |
| CHI | Q4 11:13 | 7 | 16 | Field goal | 19–10 |
| DEN | Q4 8:46 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 19–10 |
| CHI | Q4 8:06 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 19–10 |
| DEN | Q4 7:05 | 10 | 69 | Turnover on downs | 19–10 |
| CHI | Q4 3:45 | 6 | 13 | Punt | 19–10 |
| DEN | Q4 1:06 | 5 | 37 | End of half | 19–10 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Chandler | 8/18 | 79 | 0 | 0 |
| Kordell Stewart | 7/15 | 47 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony Thomas | 21 | 60 | 2.9 | 0 |
| Kordell Stewart | 8 | 29 | 3.6 | 1 |
| Stanley Pritchett | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 |
| Bobby Wade | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Chris Chandler | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
Broncos
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jake Plummer | 19/35 | 176 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinton Portis | 14 | 165 | 11.8 | 0 |
| Quentin Griffin | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 0 |
| Jake Plummer | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Broncos; negative favour Bears.
Half-point at risk
1.32%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
51.6%
Expected total
45.8est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.66
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment-3.29
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+0.94



