2005 · Week 2

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Daunte Culpepper

8·37

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Carson Palmer

Paul Brown Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 74°F · wind 0mph

Closing spread

CIN -3

Total

47

Model margin

+4.8est.

CIN perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Bengals
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Bengals winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapBengals
  • -0.074EPA / play+0.102
  • 40.6%Success rate48.2%
  • -0.009EPA / dropback+0.159
  • -0.185EPA / rush+0.023
  • 7.1%Explosive rate9.1%
  • 33.7%Third-down rate43.8%
  • 48.7%Red-zone TD rate60.3%
  • 1.46Points / drive2.30
  • 2.7%Turnover rate1.9%
  • -0.028EPA / play allowed+0.010

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CIN lead 4–3 since 1999

Meetings average 48.9 points. CIN are 3-3-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W3CIN @ MIN1048MIN
2023 · W15MIN @ CIN2427CIN
2021 · W1MIN @ CIN2427CIN
2017 · W15CIN @ MIN734MIN
2013 · W16MIN @ CIN1442CIN
2009 · W14CIN @ MIN1030MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daunte Culpepper21/3723605

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Michael Bennett33612.00
Mewelde Moore8293.60
Daunte Culpepper2105.01
Moe Williams122.00

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer27/4033731

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Rudi Johnson22904.10
Chris Perry9475.20
T.J. Houshmandzadeh22412.01
Carson Palmer430.80

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +33.5%6.5%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%3.0%

Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

7.47%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

62.0%

Expected total

44.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.11
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+2.39
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.85