2005 · Week 15

Final

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Carson Palmer

41·17

Lions

Detroit

QB Jeff Garcia

Ford Field · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

CIN -7.5

Total

44

Model margin

+2.1est.

DET perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Lions
  • Bengals

How each play moved the game.

Lions winsBengals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bengalsedge mapLions
  • +0.102EPA / play-0.102
  • 48.2%Success rate38.8%
  • +0.159EPA / dropback-0.109
  • +0.023EPA / rush-0.090
  • 9.1%Explosive rate5.7%
  • 43.8%Third-down rate38.8%
  • 60.3%Red-zone TD rate54.3%
  • 2.30Points / drive1.20
  • 1.9%Turnover rate2.8%
  • +0.010EPA / play allowed-0.020

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CIN lead 6–1 since 1999

Meetings average 50.3 points. DET are 2-5 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W5DET @ CIN3724DET
2021 · W6CIN @ DET3411CIN
2017 · W16DET @ CIN1726CIN
2013 · W7CIN @ DET2724CIN
2009 · W13DET @ CIN1323CIN
2001 · W7CIN @ DET3127CIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer28/3927432
Jon Kitna2/3600

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Rudi Johnson241174.92
Jon Kitna11111.00
Chad Johnson199.00
Carson Palmer188.00

Lions

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jeff Garcia13/2113813
Joey Harrington6/77710

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Artose Pinner15553.70
Shawn Bryson122.00
Jeff Garcia122.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -7.54.1%2.7%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.7%

Positive margins favour Lions; negative favour Bengals.

Half-point at risk

4.06%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

54.7%

Expected total

45.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.33
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.87
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.10