Closing spread
BAL -2.5
Total
34
Model margin
+2.8est.
BAL perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Ravens
- Vikings
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.074EPA / play-0.109
- 40.6%Success rate38.7%
- -0.009EPA / dropback-0.061
- -0.185EPA / rush-0.179
- 7.1%Explosive rate7.2%
- 33.7%Third-down rate39.5%
- 48.7%Red-zone TD rate39.7%
- 1.46Points / drive1.20
- 2.7%Turnover rate3.2%
- -0.028EPA / play allowed-0.088
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
BAL lead 5–2 since 1999
BAL have won 2 straight. Meetings average 49.3 points. BAL are 4-3 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | MIN–BAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 64 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| BAL | Q1 11:01 | 17 | 73 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| MIN | Q1 1:35 | 4 | 3 | Punt | 7–7 |
| BAL | Q2 15:00 | 5 | 6 | Punt | 7–7 |
| MIN | Q2 11:16 | 4 | 19 | Punt | 7–7 |
| BAL | Q2 8:34 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–7 |
| MIN | Q2 7:03 | 12 | 95 | Touchdown | 14–7 |
| BAL | Q2 1:06 | 8 | 56 | Field goal | 14–10 |
| BAL | Q3 15:00 | 0 | 0 | Field goal | 14–10 |
| MIN | Q3 14:52 | 3 | 8 | Field goal | 17–10 |
| BAL | Q3 13:29 | 7 | 70 | Touchdown | 17–17 |
| MIN | Q3 9:49 | 11 | 28 | Field goal | 20–17 |
| BAL | Q3 4:14 | 13 | 69 | Touchdown | 20–24 |
| MIN | Q4 14:47 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 20–24 |
| BAL | Q4 12:32 | 4 | 14 | Turnover | 20–24 |
| MIN | Q4 10:23 | 5 | 21 | Punt | 20–24 |
| BAL | Q4 8:07 | 11 | 63 | Field goal | 20–27 |
| MIN | Q4 1:55 | 2 | -16 | Turnover | 20–27 |
| BAL | Q4 1:31 | 3 | 9 | Field goal | 20–30 |
| MIN | Q4 1:03 | 4 | 32 | Field goal | 23–30 |
| BAL | Q4 0:15 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 23–30 |
Box score
Individual performances
Vikings
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Johnson | 25/36 | 248 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mewelde Moore | 10 | 49 | 4.9 | 0 |
| Michael Bennett | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 |
| Travis Taylor | 1 | -2 | -2.0 | 0 |
| Ciatrick Fason | 2 | -4 | -2.0 | 0 |
Ravens
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Boller | 24/34 | 289 | 3 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamal Lewis | 24 | 74 | 3.1 | 0 |
| Chester Taylor | 5 | 15 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Kyle Boller | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 |
| Mark Clayton | 1 | -2 | -2.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Ravens; negative favour Vikings.
Half-point at risk
7.52%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
56.6%
Expected total
42.6est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.31
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential-0.08
- Expected margin+2.79



