2008 · Week 4

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Gus Frerotte

17·30

Titans

Tennessee

QB Kerry Collins

LP Field · outdoors · grass · 78°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

TEN -3

Total

35

Model margin

+1.7est.

TEN perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Titans
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Titans winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapTitans
  • -0.039EPA / play-0.003
  • 40.9%Success rate41.7%
  • +0.001EPA / dropback+0.037
  • -0.081EPA / rush-0.044
  • 9.0%Explosive rate9.0%
  • -2.18CPOE-2.44
  • 39.7%Third-down rate36.7%
  • 53.5%Red-zone TD rate64.5%
  • 1.59Points / drive1.83
  • 2.7%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 5–2 since 1999

Meetings average 44.4 points. TEN are 1-6 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W11MIN @ TEN2313MIN
2020 · W3TEN @ MIN3130TEN
2016 · W1MIN @ TEN2516MIN
2012 · W5TEN @ MIN730MIN
2004 · W7TEN @ MIN320MIN
2001 · W13TEN @ MIN2442MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Gus Frerotte25/4326601
Tarvaris Jackson1/1800

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson18804.42
Gus Frerotte100.00
Chester Taylor100.00

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kerry Collins18/3519900

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Johnson17613.62
LenDale White11131.21
Kerry Collins620.30

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +34.1%2.8%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

7.49%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

53.6%

Expected total

43.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.79
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.70