2004 · Week 7

Final

Titans

Tennessee

QB Steve McNair

3·20

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Daunte Culpepper

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

MIN -6

Total

53

Model margin

+3.8est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

3.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Titansedge mapVikings
  • -0.012EPA / play+0.162
  • 41.5%Success rate50.0%
  • +0.035EPA / dropback+0.287
  • -0.091EPA / rush-0.097
  • 8.8%Explosive rate10.7%
  • 34.6%Third-down rate52.5%
  • 61.4%Red-zone TD rate64.5%
  • 1.47Points / drive2.26
  • 2.8%Turnover rate2.0%
  • +0.076EPA / play allowed+0.107

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 5–2 since 1999

Meetings average 44.4 points. MIN are 6-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W11MIN @ TEN2313MIN
2020 · W3TEN @ MIN3130TEN
2016 · W1MIN @ TEN2516MIN
2012 · W5TEN @ MIN730MIN
2008 · W4MIN @ TEN1730TEN
2001 · W13TEN @ MIN2442MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Billy Volek17/3619003
Steve McNair2/5200

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Brown14553.90

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daunte Culpepper24/3018310

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Mewelde Moore201386.90
Moe Williams3103.31
Daunte Culpepper341.30
Michael Bennett100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +63.7%6.7%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

3.16%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

59.2%

Expected total

48.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.90
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-0.66
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.80