2012 · Week 5

Final

Titans

Tennessee

QB Matt Hasselbeck

7·30

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Christian Ponder

Mall of America Field · dome · sportturf

Closing spread

MIN -6

Total

44

Model margin

+3.6est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

3.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Titansedge mapVikings
  • -0.093EPA / play+0.011
  • 38.0%Success rate42.1%
  • -0.054EPA / dropback+0.030
  • -0.166EPA / rush-0.013
  • 8.2%Explosive rate9.7%
  • -2.87CPOE-2.66
  • 38.2%Third-down rate37.4%
  • 55.5%Red-zone TD rate59.6%
  • 1.29Points / drive1.91
  • 2.8%Turnover rate2.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 5–2 since 1999

Meetings average 44.4 points. MIN are 6-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W11MIN @ TEN2313MIN
2020 · W3TEN @ MIN3130TEN
2016 · W1MIN @ TEN2516MIN
2008 · W4MIN @ TEN1730TEN
2004 · W7TEN @ MIN320MIN
2001 · W13TEN @ MIN2442MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck26/4320011
Rusty Smith3/53400

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Johnson15241.60
Matt Hasselbeck2105.00
Darius Reynaud188.00

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Christian Ponder25/3525822

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson17885.20
Toby Gerhart6416.80
Christian Ponder33110.30
Percy Harvin284.01
Matt Asiata284.00
Joe Webb1-1-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +63.8%6.8%7.5%3.2%4.8%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

3.15%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

58.7%

Expected total

42.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.70
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.43
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.61