2015 · Week 9

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

22·19

Chargers

San Diego

QB Philip Rivers

Qualcomm Stadium · outdoors · grass · 63°F · wind 9mph

Closing spread

SD -3.5

Total

49

Model margin

+3.7est.

SD perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Availability

The injury report

The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.

Bears

Chargers

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

CHI lead 4–3 since 1999

CHARGERS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 36.4 points. SD are 3-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W8CHI @ LAC13–30CHARGERS
2019 · W8LAC @ CHI17–16CHARGERS
2011 · W11SD @ CHI20–31CHI
2007 · W1CHI @ SD3–14CHARGERS
2003 · W9SD @ CHI7–20CHI
1999 · W11CHI @ SD23–20CHI

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultCHI–SD
CHIQ1 15:00845Missed field goal0–0
LACQ1 11:32968Touchdown0–7
CHIQ1 6:50962Turnover0–7
LACQ1 1:33934Punt0–7
CHIQ2 13:1338Punt0–7
LACQ2 11:44216Turnover0–7
CHIQ2 10:5023Opp touchdown0–13
CHIQ2 9:58780Touchdown7–13
LACQ2 6:53823Punt7–13
CHIQ2 3:31423Punt7–13
LACQ2 2:061166Field goal7–16
CHIQ2 0:0300End of half7–16
LACQ3 15:0033Punt7–16
CHIQ3 13:25944Missed field goal7–16
LACQ3 9:28627Punt7–16
CHIQ3 7:1816103Touchdown14–16
LACQ4 14:021486Field goal14–19
CHIQ4 7:531080Touchdown22–19
LACQ4 3:19916Turnover on downs22–19
CHIQ4 1:0900End of half22–19

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler27/4034521

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jeremy Langford18724.01
Ka'Deem Carey7284.00
Antone Smith11111.00
Jay Cutler3-2-0.70

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +3.53.8%6.7%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

2.55%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

59.0%

Expected total

44.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.23
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.72

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.