Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2023 · Week 8

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Tyson Bagent

13·30

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Justin Herbert

SoFi Stadium · dome · matrixturf

Closing spread

LAC -9.5

Total

46

Model margin

+0.2est.

LAC perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapChargers
  • -0.052EPA / play-0.070
  • 41.6%Success rate41.4%
  • -0.057EPA / dropback+0.018
  • -0.045EPA / rush-0.242
  • 9.6%Explosive rate6.9%
  • +0.01CPOE-1.84
  • 41.7%Third-down rate38.3%
  • 62.5%Red-zone TD rate54.8%
  • 1.72Points / drive1.75
  • 2.2%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CHI lead 4–3 since 1999

CHARGERS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 36.4 points. LAC are 3-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2019 · W8LAC @ CHI1716CHARGERS
2015 · W9CHI @ SD2219CHI
2011 · W11SD @ CHI2031CHI
2007 · W1CHI @ SD314CHARGERS
2003 · W9SD @ CHI720CHI
1999 · W11CHI @ SD2320CHI

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tyson Bagent25/3723202

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
D'Onta Foreman9343.80
Roschon Johnson6213.50
Darrynton Evans4184.51
Darnell Mooney133.00
Tyson Bagent4-1-0.31
Trent Taylor1-2-2.00

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Justin Herbert31/4029830

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Austin Ekeler15291.90
Joshua Kelley6213.50
Isaiah Spiller331.00
Justin Herbert111.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +9.57.3%7.4%2.9%4.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

2.72%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

49.5%

Expected total

42.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.09
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.55
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.16