Closing spread
CHI -3.5
Total
41
Model margin
+1.1est.
CHI perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Chargers
- OutBrandon MebaneDTKnee· DNP
- OutCortez BroughtonDTIllness· DNP
- OutJustin JonesDTShoulder· DNP
- OutNasir AdderleySHamstring· DNP
- QuestionableDerek WattRBKnee· Full
- QuestionableJustin JacksonRBCalf· Limited
- QuestionableKeenan AllenWRHamstring· DNP
- QuestionableMelvin IngramDEHamstring· Full
- QuestionableMichael BadgleyKright Groin· Full
Bears
- QuestionableBilal NicholsDTKnee· Limited
Win probability
- Bears
- Chargers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.036EPA / play-0.079
- 47.3%Success rate41.1%
- +0.118EPA / dropback-0.020
- -0.118EPA / rush-0.188
- 9.0%Explosive rate6.0%
- +3.58CPOE-1.71
- 45.5%Third-down rate36.4%
- 57.1%Red-zone TD rate55.7%
- 1.99Points / drive1.50
- 2.8%Turnover rate1.7%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
CHI lead 4–3 since 1999
CHARGERS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 36.4 points. CHI are 4-3 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | LAC–CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAC | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 13:49 | 4 | 7 | Punt | 0–0 |
| LAC | Q1 10:46 | 4 | 16 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 8:42 | 10 | 70 | Missed field goal | 0–0 |
| LAC | Q1 2:14 | 3 | 1 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 0:37 | 3 | 0 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| LAC | Q2 14:45 | 4 | 19 | Punt | 0–3 |
| CHI | Q2 12:28 | 6 | 12 | Punt | 0–3 |
| LAC | Q2 10:10 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 0–3 |
| CHI | Q2 8:45 | 8 | 59 | Field goal | 0–6 |
| LAC | Q2 4:16 | 4 | 75 | Touchdown | 7–6 |
| CHI | Q2 2:12 | 10 | 70 | Field goal | 7–9 |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 11 | 75 | Touchdown | 7–16 |
| LAC | Q3 8:08 | 14 | 83 | Field goal | 10–16 |
| CHI | Q3 0:39 | 5 | 15 | Turnover | 10–16 |
| LAC | Q4 12:54 | 4 | 6 | Missed field goal | 10–16 |
| CHI | Q4 10:53 | 4 | -4 | Turnover | 10–16 |
| LAC | Q4 9:25 | 3 | 14 | Touchdown | 17–16 |
| CHI | Q4 8:04 | 12 | 41 | Punt | 17–16 |
| LAC | Q4 2:04 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 17–16 |
| CHI | Q4 1:33 | 5 | 44 | Missed field goal | 17–16 |
Box score
Individual performances
Chargers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip Rivers | 19/29 | 201 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melvin Gordon | 8 | 31 | 3.9 | 1 |
| Austin Ekeler | 3 | 3 | 1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Williams | 3 | 6 | 69 | 0 |
| Keenan Allen | 7 | 10 | 53 | 0 |
| Hunter Henry | 4 | 6 | 47 | 0 |
| Austin Ekeler | 2 | 3 | 19 | 1 |
| Virgil Green | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
| Melvin Gordon | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitchell Trubisky | 23/35 | 253 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Montgomery | 27 | 135 | 5.0 | 1 |
| Mitchell Trubisky | 4 | 10 | 2.5 | 0 |
| Tarik Cohen | 4 | 9 | 2.3 | 0 |
| Cordarrelle Patterson | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Mike Davis | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony Miller | 3 | 3 | 67 | 0 |
| Allen Robinson | 5 | 7 | 62 | 0 |
| Taylor Gabriel | 4 | 6 | 53 | 0 |
| Tarik Cohen | 3 | 3 | 37 | 0 |
| Trey Burton | 1 | 4 | 16 | 0 |
| David Montgomery | 4 | 5 | 12 | 0 |
| Mike Davis | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Cordarrelle Patterson | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Adam Shaheen | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Chargers.
Half-point at risk
2.50%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
52.1%
Expected total
43.9est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.61
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+1.13



