2016 · Week 1
FinalFedExField · outdoors · grass · 79°F · wind 4mph
Closing spread
PIT -2.5
Total
49
Model margin
+0.9est.
WAS perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Steelers
- OutCody WallaceCKnee· DNP
- OutMarkus WheatonWRShoulder· DNP
- OutRoosevelt NixRBBack· DNP
- OutSenquez GolsonCBFoot· DNP
Commanders
- QuestionableJosh DoctsonWRAchilles· Full
- QuestionableKedric GolstonDTBack· DNP
- QuestionableKendall ReyesDEGroin· Full
- QuestionableMatt JonesRBShoulder· Full
- QuestionableSpencer LongGAnkle· Full
Win probability
- Commanders
- Steelers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.085EPA / play+0.118
- 46.0%Success rate48.2%
- +0.164EPA / dropback+0.202
- -0.043EPA / rush-0.033
- 10.8%Explosive rate10.6%
- +1.74CPOE+4.99
- 41.9%Third-down rate44.9%
- 64.0%Red-zone TD rate51.2%
- 2.24Points / drive2.32
- 1.7%Turnover rate1.9%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PIT lead 6–1 since 1999
Meetings average 38.1 points. WAS are 2-5 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | PIT–WAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAS | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 35 | Punt | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 11:16 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 0–0 |
| WAS | Q1 9:20 | 8 | 54 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| PIT | Q1 5:56 | 5 | 29 | Turnover | 0–3 |
| WAS | Q1 3:46 | 4 | 19 | Field goal | 0–6 |
| PIT | Q1 1:08 | 11 | 77 | Touchdown | 7–6 |
| WAS | Q2 10:10 | 6 | 57 | Turnover on downs | 7–6 |
| PIT | Q2 6:19 | 14 | 67 | Touchdown | 14–6 |
| WAS | Q2 0:27 | 1 | 9 | End of half | 14–6 |
| PIT | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 47 | Field goal | 17–6 |
| WAS | Q3 11:18 | 4 | 15 | Turnover | 17–6 |
| PIT | Q3 9:05 | 5 | 75 | Touchdown | 24–6 |
| WAS | Q3 7:01 | 9 | 67 | Field goal | 24–9 |
| PIT | Q3 2:01 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 24–9 |
| WAS | Q3 0:19 | 7 | 77 | Touchdown | 24–16 |
| PIT | Q4 13:01 | 13 | 83 | Touchdown | 31–16 |
| WAS | Q4 5:48 | 5 | 25 | Turnover on downs | 31–16 |
| PIT | Q4 4:17 | 6 | 45 | Touchdown | 38–16 |
| WAS | Q4 1:54 | 7 | 26 | Turnover | 38–16 |
| PIT | Q4 0:18 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 38–16 |
Box score
Individual performances
Steelers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Roethlisberger | 27/37 | 300 | 3 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeAngelo Williams | 26 | 143 | 5.5 | 2 |
| Fitzgerald Toussaint | 3 | 6 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Ben Roethlisberger | 1 | -2 | -2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Brown | 8 | 11 | 126 | 2 |
| Eli Rogers | 6 | 7 | 59 | 1 |
| Sammie Coates | 2 | 3 | 56 | 0 |
| Jesse James | 5 | 7 | 31 | 0 |
| DeAngelo Williams | 6 | 9 | 28 | 0 |
Commanders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirk Cousins | 30/43 | 329 | 0 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Jones | 7 | 24 | 3.4 | 0 |
| Chris Thompson | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 1 |
| Kirk Cousins | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeSean Jackson | 6 | 10 | 102 | 0 |
| Jordan Reed | 7 | 11 | 64 | 0 |
| Jamison Crowder | 6 | 10 | 58 | 0 |
| Pierre Garcon | 6 | 6 | 51 | 0 |
| Vernon Davis | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 |
| Chris Thompson | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 |
| Matt Jones | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| Josh Doctson | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| Ryan Grant | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Steelers.
Half-point at risk
2.09%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
51.6%
Expected total
45.8est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.81
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+0.93



