Closing spread
PHI -10
Total
46
Model margin
+1.9est.
PHI perspective
Push chance
2.9%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Raiders
- OutMario EdwardsDEAnkle· DNP
- OutTreyvon HesterDTAnkle· DNP
- DoubtfulDavid AmersonCBFoot· DNP
- QuestionableAmari CooperWRAnkle· Limited
- QuestionableBruce IrvinLBConcussion· Limited
- QuestionableDenico AutryDEHand· Limited
- QuestionableDexter McDonaldCBKnee· Limited
- QuestionableKeith McGillSKnee· Limited
- QuestionableRodney HudsonCAnkle· Limited
- DNPClive WalfordTEConcussion
- DNPDonald PennTFoot
- DNPJon FelicianoGConcussion
- DNPKhalil MackDENot Injury Related
- DNPMarshawn LynchRBNot Injury Related
Eagles
- QuestionableJalen MillsCBAnkle· Full
- QuestionableMychal KendricksLBFoot· Full
- QuestionableStefen WisniewskiGAnkle· Limited
Win probability
- Eagles
- Raiders
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
The rivalry
PHI lead 4–3 since 1999
Meetings average 39.9 points. PHI are 2-5 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | OAK–PHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 0–0 |
| LV | Q1 13:59 | 7 | 28 | Turnover on downs | 0–0 |
| PHI | Q1 9:07 | 11 | 68 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| LV | Q1 2:51 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 0–7 |
| PHI | Q1 1:34 | 6 | 9 | Punt | 0–7 |
| LV | Q2 14:00 | 3 | 74 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| PHI | Q2 12:36 | 5 | 26 | Punt | 7–7 |
| LV | Q2 10:33 | 13 | 52 | Punt | 7–7 |
| PHI | Q2 3:08 | 13 | 71 | Missed field goal | 7–7 |
| LV | Q2 0:11 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 7–7 |
| LV | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 64 | Field goal | 10–7 |
| PHI | Q3 10:50 | 4 | 12 | Punt | 10–7 |
| LV | Q3 8:51 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 10–7 |
| PHI | Q3 7:13 | 3 | -9 | Punt | 10–7 |
| LV | Q3 5:35 | 3 | 5 | Turnover | 10–7 |
| PHI | Q3 4:16 | 2 | 14 | Turnover | 10–7 |
| LV | Q3 3:55 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 10–7 |
| PHI | Q3 3:46 | 4 | 13 | Field goal | 10–10 |
| LV | Q3 2:13 | 4 | 14 | Punt | 10–10 |
| PHI | Q4 13:57 | 3 | -18 | Punt | 10–10 |
| LV | Q4 12:18 | 9 | 16 | Missed field goal | 10–10 |
| PHI | Q4 7:58 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 10–10 |
| LV | Q4 7:52 | 4 | 31 | Turnover | 10–10 |
| PHI | Q4 6:35 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 10–10 |
| LV | Q4 4:47 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 10–10 |
| PHI | Q4 2:19 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 10–10 |
| LV | Q4 1:07 | 2 | 0 | Turnover | 10–10 |
| PHI | Q4 0:54 | 5 | 21 | Field goal | 10–13 |
| LV | Q4 0:22 | 4 | -13 | Opp touchdown | 10–19 |
Box score
Individual performances
Eagles
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Foles | 19/38 | 163 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Ajayi | 14 | 52 | 3.7 | 0 |
| Corey Clement | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 |
| LeGarrette Blount | 5 | 12 | 2.4 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zach Ertz | 9 | 14 | 81 | 0 |
| Nelson Agholor | 4 | 7 | 35 | 0 |
| Jay Ajayi | 2 | 3 | 21 | 1 |
| Brent Celek | 1 | 2 | 12 | 0 |
| Corey Clement | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
| Torrey Smith | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| LeGarrette Blount | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Alshon Jeffery | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Eagles; negative favour Raiders.
Half-point at risk
2.94%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
54.2%
Expected total
43.2est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.61
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment-1.44
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+1.91
One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.



