2021 · Week 1

Final

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Justin Herbert

20·16

Commanders

Washington

QB Ryan Fitzpatrick

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 81°F · wind 4mph

Closing spread

WAS -2.5

Total

45.5

Model margin

-0.7est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Chargers

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsChargers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Chargersedge mapCommanders
  • +0.088EPA / play-0.036
  • 47.4%Success rate44.8%
  • +0.167EPA / dropback-0.018
  • -0.075EPA / rush-0.062
  • 7.5%Explosive rate8.3%
  • -0.71CPOE-0.08
  • 45.7%Third-down rate38.3%
  • 68.6%Red-zone TD rate59.5%
  • 2.55Points / drive1.78
  • 1.8%Turnover rate2.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LAC lead 5–2 since 1999

Meetings average 40.9 points. WAS are 2-4-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W5WAS @ LAC2710WAS
2017 · W14WAS @ LAC1330CHARGERS
2013 · W9SD @ WAS2430WAS
2009 · W17WAS @ SD2023CHARGERS
2005 · W12SD @ WAS2317CHARGERS
2001 · W1WAS @ SD330CHARGERS

Box score

Individual performances

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Justin Herbert31/4733711

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Austin Ekeler15573.81
Larry Rountree III8273.40
Justin Jackson155.00
Justin Herbert4-1-0.30

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Taylor Heinicke11/1512210
Ryan Fitzpatrick3/61300

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Antonio Gibson20904.50
Taylor Heinicke3175.70
Jaret Patterson294.50
J.D. McKissic188.00
Ryan Fitzpatrick122.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Terry McLaurin44620
Logan Thomas33301
Antonio Gibson35180
Cam Sims11170
Adam Humphries22100
J.D. McKissic0100
Dyami Brown14-20

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +2.52.8%4.5%3.0%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.3%2.6%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Chargers.

Half-point at risk

7.27%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

47.1%

Expected total

44.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.42
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-0.72