Closing spread
SF -10
Total
41.5
Model margin
-5.1est.
LV perspective
Push chance
3.3%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
49ers
- OutDeebo SamuelWRAnkle· Limited
- OutJimmy GaroppoloQBFoot· DNP
- OutKevin GivensDTKnee· DNP
- QuestionableAmbry ThomasCBAnkle· Limited
- QuestionableKerry HyderDEAnkle· Limited
- LimitedJavon KinlawDTKnee
Raiders
- QuestionableJackson BartonTBack· Limited
- QuestionableZamir WhiteRBAnkle· Limited
- DNPDerek CarrQBNot injury related - personal matter
- LimitedRock Ya-SinCBKnee
Win probability
- Raiders
- 49ers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.084EPA / play+0.009
- 46.1%Success rate43.4%
- +0.171EPA / dropback+0.057
- -0.021EPA / rush-0.071
- 10.7%Explosive rate9.9%
- -1.99CPOE-2.03
- 45.1%Third-down rate39.7%
- 60.5%Red-zone TD rate59.7%
- 2.20Points / drive2.10
- 1.6%Turnover rate1.9%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
SF lead 5–2 since 1999
SF have won 2 straight. Meetings average 47.1 points. LV are 4-3 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | SF–LV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV | Q1 15:00 | 6 | 70 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| SF | Q1 11:40 | 8 | 67 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| LV | Q1 7:06 | 10 | 64 | Field goal | 7–10 |
| SF | Q1 1:45 | 15 | 50 | Touchdown | 14–10 |
| LV | Q2 9:38 | 10 | 68 | Turnover on downs | 14–10 |
| SF | Q2 4:29 | 4 | 8 | Punt | 14–10 |
| LV | Q2 2:33 | 8 | 44 | Touchdown | 14–17 |
| SF | Q2 0:10 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 14–17 |
| SF | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 14–17 |
| LV | Q3 13:16 | 6 | 70 | Touchdown | 14–24 |
| SF | Q3 10:22 | 9 | 85 | Touchdown | 21–24 |
| LV | Q3 5:22 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 21–24 |
| SF | Q3 4:02 | 4 | 41 | Turnover | 21–24 |
| LV | Q3 2:24 | 6 | 36 | Turnover | 21–24 |
| SF | Q4 14:46 | 5 | 17 | Field goal | 24–24 |
| LV | Q4 12:34 | 5 | 16 | Punt | 24–24 |
| SF | Q4 9:42 | 6 | 59 | Field goal | 27–24 |
| LV | Q4 6:44 | 6 | 41 | Field goal | 27–27 |
| SF | Q4 4:08 | 5 | 75 | Touchdown | 34–27 |
| LV | Q4 2:17 | 5 | 67 | Touchdown | 34–34 |
| SF | Q4 1:11 | 6 | 52 | Missed field goal | 34–34 |
| LV | OT | 4 | 15 | Turnover | 34–34 |
| SF | OT | 0 | 0 | Field goal | 37–34 |
Box score
Individual performances
49ers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brock Purdy | 22/35 | 284 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian McCaffrey | 19 | 121 | 6.4 | 1 |
| Brandon Aiyuk | 1 | 16 | 16.0 | 0 |
| Jordan Mason | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 1 |
| Danny Gray | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 |
| Tyrion Davis-Price | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Brock Purdy | 2 | -3 | -1.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Aiyuk | 9 | 12 | 101 | 1 |
| Christian McCaffrey | 6 | 9 | 72 | 0 |
| Jauan Jennings | 2 | 3 | 46 | 0 |
| Ray-Ray McCloud | 1 | 2 | 42 | 0 |
| George Kittle | 4 | 8 | 23 | 1 |
Raiders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarrett Stidham | 23/34 | 365 | 3 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Jacobs | 17 | 69 | 4.1 | 1 |
| Jarrett Stidham | 7 | 34 | 4.9 | 0 |
| Brandon Bolden | 8 | 32 | 4.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davante Adams | 7 | 11 | 153 | 2 |
| Darren Waller | 3 | 5 | 72 | 1 |
| Foster Moreau | 3 | 3 | 55 | 0 |
| Mack Hollins | 3 | 4 | 40 | 0 |
| Josh Jacobs | 4 | 5 | 26 | 0 |
| Hunter Renfrow | 3 | 4 | 19 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Raiders; negative favour 49ers.
Half-point at risk
3.26%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
35.7%
Expected total
44.8est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-5.40
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment-1.36
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-5.06



