Closing spread
BAL -2.5
Total
45.5
Model margin
+3.3est.
BAL perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bears
- OutBraxton JonesTKnee· DNP
- OutCole KmetTEBack· DNP
- OutKyler GordonCBGroin· DNP
- OutRoschon JohnsonRBBack· DNP
- OutTyrique StevensonCBShoulder· DNP
- QuestionableAmen OgbongbemigaLBKnee· Full
- QuestionableAustin BookerDEKnee· Full
- QuestionableCairo SantosKThigh· Full
- QuestionableD'Andre SwiftRBGroin· Limited
Ravens
- OutLamar JacksonQBHamstring· Limited
- DNPRonnie StanleyTAnkle
Win probability
- Ravens
- Bears
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.076EPA / play+0.037
- 45.7%Success rate44.6%
- +0.122EPA / dropback+0.036
- +0.007EPA / rush+0.038
- 10.1%Explosive rate10.4%
- -3.48CPOE+2.86
- 42.0%Third-down rate41.4%
- 66.8%Red-zone TD rate57.3%
- 2.32Points / drive2.30
- 1.0%Turnover rate2.2%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
BAL lead 4–3 since 1999
BAL have won 2 straight. Meetings average 35.1 points. BAL are 4-3 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CHI–BAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 12 | 69 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| BAL | Q1 6:50 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 3–0 |
| CHI | Q1 4:34 | 11 | 56 | Field goal | 6–0 |
| BAL | Q1 0:03 | 12 | 82 | Touchdown | 6–7 |
| CHI | Q2 8:15 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 6–7 |
| BAL | Q2 6:33 | 13 | 56 | Field goal | 6–10 |
| CHI | Q2 1:06 | 5 | 42 | Missed field goal | 6–10 |
| BAL | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 56 | Field goal | 6–13 |
| CHI | Q3 10:05 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 6–13 |
| BAL | Q3 7:57 | 9 | 71 | Field goal | 6–16 |
| CHI | Q3 3:35 | 11 | 83 | Touchdown | 13–16 |
| BAL | Q4 12:22 | 5 | 17 | Punt | 13–16 |
| CHI | Q4 9:48 | 2 | 2 | Turnover | 13–16 |
| BAL | Q4 9:00 | 2 | 9 | Touchdown | 13–23 |
| CHI | Q4 8:13 | 9 | 48 | Field goal | 16–23 |
| BAL | Q4 5:06 | 10 | 56 | Touchdown | 16–30 |
| CHI | Q4 2:09 | 7 | 64 | Turnover on downs | 16–30 |
| BAL | Q4 0:24 | 1 | 0 | End of half | 16–30 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb Williams | 25/38 | 285 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D'Andre Swift | 11 | 45 | 4.1 | 1 |
| Caleb Williams | 3 | 24 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Kyle Monangai | 7 | 24 | 3.4 | 0 |
| DJ Moore | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rome Odunze | 7 | 10 | 114 | 0 |
| DJ Moore | 4 | 7 | 73 | 0 |
| Colston Loveland | 3 | 5 | 38 | 0 |
| Olamide Zaccheaus | 7 | 7 | 33 | 0 |
| D'Andre Swift | 2 | 2 | 26 | 0 |
| Devin Duvernay | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Luther Burden III | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
Ravens
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Huntley | 17/22 | 186 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick Henry | 21 | 71 | 3.4 | 2 |
| Tyler Huntley | 8 | 53 | 6.6 | 0 |
| Keaton Mitchell | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 0 |
| Zay Flowers | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Justice Hill | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zay Flowers | 7 | 9 | 63 | 0 |
| Rashod Bateman | 2 | 4 | 51 | 0 |
| Mark Andrews | 3 | 3 | 34 | 0 |
| DeAndre Hopkins | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 |
| Charlie Kolar | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 |
| Isaiah Likely | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
| Tylan Wallace | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Derrick Henry | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Ravens; negative favour Bears.
Half-point at risk
7.52%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
57.8%
Expected total
45.9est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.96
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment+0.04
- Rest differential+0.56
- Expected margin+3.27



