1999 · Week 4

Final

Rams

St. Louis

QB Kurt Warner

38·10

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Jeff Blake

Cinergy Field · outdoors · astroturf · 62°F · wind 0mph

Closing spread

STL -3.5

Total

44

Model margin

+1.4est.

CIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Bengals
  • Rams

How each play moved the game.

Bengals winsRams wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

All square 4–4 since 1999

Meetings average 37.1 points. CIN are 2-4-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W3LA @ CIN1619CIN
2021 · playoffsLA @ CIN2320RAMS
2019 · W8CIN @ LA1024RAMS
2015 · W12STL @ CIN731CIN
2011 · W15CIN @ STL2013CIN
2007 · W14STL @ CIN1019CIN
2003 · W16CIN @ STL1027RAMS

Box score

Individual performances

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jeff Blake12/2311400
Akili Smith7/187701

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Corey Dillon15392.60
Michael Basnight6274.50
Jeff Blake2147.00
Akili Smith3124.01

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -3.54.2%2.8%7.2%7.5%3.0%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Rams.

Half-point at risk

7.16%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

52.9%

Expected total

45.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.13
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.43

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.