2003 · Week 14

Final

Rams

St. Louis

QB Marc Bulger

26·20

Browns

Cleveland

QB Kelly Holcomb

Cleveland Browns Stadium · outdoors · grass · 35°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

STL -5.5

Total

43.5

Model margin

+0.7est.

CLE perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Browns
  • Rams

How each play moved the game.

Browns winsRams wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

STL lead 6–1 since 1999

RAMS have won 4 straight. Meetings average 39 points. CLE are 1-6 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W13CLE @ LA19–36RAMS
2019 · W3LA @ CLE20–13RAMS
2015 · W7CLE @ STL6–24RAMS
2011 · W10STL @ CLE13–12RAMS
2007 · W8CLE @ STL27–20CLE
1999 · W7CLE @ STL3–34RAMS

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultSTL–CLE
CLEQ1 15:0055Punt0–0
LAQ1 12:561047Field goal3–0
CLEQ1 7:18757Touchdown3–7
LAQ1 4:13517Punt3–7
CLEQ1 1:24416Punt3–7
LAQ2 14:0523Turnover3–7
CLEQ2 13:19311Turnover3–7
LAQ2 11:58950Field goal6–7
CLEQ2 8:01415Punt6–7
LAQ2 5:32760Field goal9–7
CLEQ2 1:52416Opp touchdown16–7
CLEQ2 1:0423Turnover16–7
LAQ2 0:39220Touchdown23–7
CLEQ2 0:22216End of half23–7
LAQ3 15:0031Punt23–7
CLEQ3 12:58647Touchdown23–13
LAQ3 10:311249Field goal26–13
CLEQ3 3:53320Turnover26–13
LAQ3 2:3038Punt26–13
CLEQ3 1:061183Touchdown26–20
LAQ4 10:171149Missed field goal26–20
CLEQ4 4:48419Punt26–20
LAQ4 2:4636Punt26–20
CLEQ4 2:1141Turnover on downs26–20
LAQ4 1:48221End of half26–20

Box score

Individual performances

Browns

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tim Couch6/99810
Kelly Holcomb10/178012

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jamel White161016.31
James Jackson4307.50
Dennis Northcutt2168.00
Tim Couch188.00
Andre Davis177.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -5.52.6%4.3%2.9%7.3%7.4%3.0%4.5%2.8%

Positive margins favour Browns; negative favour Rams.

Half-point at risk

1.82%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.0%

Expected total

44.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.86
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.70

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.