2005 · Week 3

Final

Titans

Tennessee

QB Steve McNair

27·31

Rams

St. Louis

QB Marc Bulger

Edward Jones Dome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

STL -6.5

Total

46

Model margin

+5.4est.

STL perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

All square 4–4 since 1999

Meetings average 48.9 points. STL are 1-6-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W2LA @ TEN33–19RAMS
2021 · W9TEN @ LA28–16TEN
2017 · W16LA @ TEN27–23RAMS
2013 · W9TEN @ STL28–21TEN
2009 · W14STL @ TEN7–47TEN
1999 · playoffsSTL @ TEN23–16RAMS
1999 · W8STL @ TEN21–24TEN

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultTEN–STL
LAQ1 15:0030Punt0–0
TENQ1 13:2437Punt0–0
LAQ1 11:593-1Punt0–0
TENQ1 10:23649Touchdown7–0
LAQ1 6:2110Turnover7–0
TENQ1 6:1037Field goal10–0
LAQ1 4:0166Punt10–0
TENQ1 1:01753Opp touchdown10–7
TENQ2 12:28218Turnover10–7
LAQ2 12:06736Field goal10–10
TENQ2 7:55733Turnover10–10
LAQ2 4:18661Touchdown10–17
TENQ2 2:08519Punt10–17
LAQ2 0:391-1End of half10–17
TENQ3 15:00426Punt10–17
LAQ3 12:57689Touchdown10–24
TENQ3 9:30515Punt10–24
LAQ3 7:07213Turnover10–24
TENQ3 6:52633Touchdown17–24
LAQ3 3:22212Opp touchdown24–24
LAQ3 2:37774Touchdown24–31
TENQ4 14:5430Punt24–31
LAQ4 12:51436Turnover24–31
TENQ4 10:26813Field goal27–31
LAQ4 6:02736Punt27–31
TENQ4 2:19962Turnover on downs27–31
LAQ4 0:2900End of half27–31

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Steve McNair24/3926122

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Brown20834.20
Steve McNair144.00
Travis Henry300.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +6.53.4%6.3%7.4%3.2%5.0%3.3%3.1%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

4.95%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

63.3%

Expected total

44.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.82
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+5.38

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.