1999 · SB

Final

Rams

St. Louis

QB Kurt Warner

23·16

Titans

Tennessee

QB Steve McNair

Georgia Dome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

STL -7

Total

48

Model margin

+3.8est.

TEN perspective

Push chance

3.7%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Titans
  • Rams

How each play moved the game.

Titans winsRams wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

All square 4–4 since 1999

Meetings average 48.9 points. TEN are 6-1-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W2LA @ TEN33–19RAMS
2021 · W9TEN @ LA28–16TEN
2017 · W16LA @ TEN27–23RAMS
2013 · W9TEN @ STL28–21TEN
2009 · W14STL @ TEN7–47TEN
2005 · W3TEN @ STL27–31RAMS
1999 · W8STL @ TEN21–24TEN

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultSTL–TEN
LAQ1 15:001252Turnover on downs0–0
TENQ1 9:40842Missed field goal0–0
LAQ1 5:48554Field goal3–0
TENQ1 3:00414Punt3–0
LAQ1 0:39553Missed field goal3–0
TENQ2 14:48934Punt3–0
LAQ2 9:291163Field goal6–0
TENQ2 4:1630Punt6–0
LAQ2 3:381672Field goal9–0
TENQ2 0:1500End of half9–0
TENQ3 15:00743Missed field goal9–0
LAQ3 11:19868Touchdown16–0
TENQ3 7:201266Touchdown16–6
LAQ3 0:143-1Punt16–6
TENQ4 14:361379Touchdown16–13
LAQ4 7:2132Punt16–13
TENQ4 6:17728Field goal16–16
LAQ4 2:12173Touchdown23–16
TENQ4 1:541162End of half23–16

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Steve McNair22/3621400

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Eddie George28953.42
Steve McNair8648.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Jackie Harris78640
Kevin Dyson48410
Eddie George24350
Frank Wycheck57350
Isaac Byrd23210
Derrick Mason24180
Chris Sanders0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -73.7%6.7%7.5%3.2%4.9%

Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Rams.

Half-point at risk

3.73%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

59.3%

Expected total

44.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.27
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.83

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.