Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2006 · Week 4

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brad Johnson

12·17

Bills

Buffalo

QB J.P. Losman

Ralph Wilson Stadium · outdoors · astroplay · 58°F · wind 11mph

Closing spread

BUF -1

Total

34.5

Model margin

+2.3est.

BUF perspective

Push chance

2.2%est.

Win probability

  • Bills
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Bills winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapBills
  • -0.151EPA / play-0.089
  • 39.3%Success rate41.6%
  • -0.174EPA / dropback-0.033
  • -0.117EPA / rush-0.157
  • 8.0%Explosive rate7.4%
  • +1.13CPOE+3.28
  • 33.2%Third-down rate30.9%
  • 45.1%Red-zone TD rate58.9%
  • 0.99Points / drive1.31
  • 2.9%Turnover rate2.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BUF lead 4–3 since 1999

Meetings average 50.3 points. BUF are 4-3 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2022 · W10MIN @ BUF3330MIN
2018 · W3BUF @ MIN276BUF
2014 · W7MIN @ BUF1617BUF
2010 · W13BUF @ MIN1438MIN
2002 · W2BUF @ MIN4539BUF
2000 · W8BUF @ MIN2731MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson25/4426712

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chester Taylor10232.30
Brad Johnson3186.00
Mewelde Moore2178.50
Travis Taylor155.00

Bills

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
J.P. Losman23/3222210

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Willis McGahee28782.81
J.P. Losman4174.30
Peerless Price100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +14.0%2.7%7.0%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%

Positive margins favour Bills; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

2.15%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

55.3%

Expected total

41.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.23
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.34