2006 · Week 6

Final

Titans

Tennessee

QB Vince Young

25·22

Commanders

Washington

QB Mark Brunell

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 59°F · wind 6mph

Closing spread

WAS -11.5

Total

39

Model margin

+3.1est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Titansedge mapCommanders
  • -0.086EPA / play-0.006
  • 37.6%Success rate40.9%
  • -0.059EPA / dropback+0.034
  • -0.118EPA / rush-0.052
  • 9.1%Explosive rate10.8%
  • -5.37CPOE-2.46
  • 32.7%Third-down rate38.5%
  • 58.2%Red-zone TD rate52.5%
  • 1.35Points / drive1.58
  • 2.7%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 4–4 since 1999

Meetings average 43.9 points. WAS are 4-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W13TEN @ WAS1942WAS
2022 · W5TEN @ WAS2117TEN
2018 · W16WAS @ TEN1625TEN
2014 · W7TEN @ WAS1719WAS
2010 · W11WAS @ TEN1916WAS
2002 · W5WAS @ TEN3114WAS
2000 · W9TEN @ WAS2721TEN

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Vince Young13/2516110

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Travis Henry321785.61
Vince Young6101.70
Chris Brown362.00

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mark Brunell16/3018011

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis14584.12
Santana Moss23316.50
Antwaan Randle El2189.00
Mike Sellers3155.00
Mark Brunell331.00
Ladell Betts2-2-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +11.56.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

1.20%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.4%

Expected total

46.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.55
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.11