Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2010 · Week 11

Final / OT

Commanders

Washington

QB Donovan McNabb

19·16

Titans

Tennessee

QB Vince Young

LP Field · outdoors · grass · 66°F · wind 12mph

Closing spread

TEN -7

Total

44

Model margin

+3.7est.

TEN perspective

Push chance

4.8%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Titans
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Titans winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Commandersedge mapTitans
  • -0.079EPA / play-0.017
  • 40.8%Success rate40.0%
  • -0.045EPA / dropback+0.083
  • -0.148EPA / rush-0.153
  • 9.3%Explosive rate9.4%
  • -4.10CPOE-0.87
  • 29.2%Third-down rate34.8%
  • 58.6%Red-zone TD rate61.2%
  • 1.31Points / drive1.83
  • 2.9%Turnover rate2.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 4–4 since 1999

Meetings average 43.9 points. TEN are 4-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W13TEN @ WAS1942WAS
2022 · W5TEN @ WAS2117TEN
2018 · W16WAS @ TEN1625TEN
2014 · W7TEN @ WAS1719WAS
2006 · W6TEN @ WAS2522TEN
2002 · W5WAS @ TEN3114WAS
2000 · W9TEN @ WAS2721TEN

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Donovan McNabb30/5037611

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Keiland Williams23683.00
Clinton Portis5326.40
Donovan McNabb144.00
Mike Sellers100.00

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Vince Young12/1616500
Rusty Smith3/96201

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Johnson211306.20
Vince Young3206.70
Javon Ringer111.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Nate Washington591170
Bo Scaife46510
Justin Gage11230
Jared Cook22110
Chris Johnson2360
Randy Moss0300

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +73.8%6.7%7.5%3.2%4.8%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

4.85%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

58.9%

Expected total

46.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.23
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.88
  • Rest differential+0.08
  • Expected margin+3.67