Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2000 · Week 9

Final

Titans

Tennessee

QB Steve McNair

27·21

Commanders

Washington

QB Brad Johnson

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 54°F · wind 9mph

Closing spread

WAS -4

Total

37.5

Model margin

-0.1est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

2.4%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Titansedge mapCommanders
  • -0.033EPA / play-0.027
  • 39.2%Success rate41.1%
  • +0.085EPA / dropback+0.058
  • -0.158EPA / rush-0.148
  • 7.9%Explosive rate8.1%
  • 42.4%Third-down rate39.0%
  • 46.5%Red-zone TD rate57.1%
  • 1.28Points / drive1.30
  • 2.7%Turnover rate2.9%
  • -0.194EPA / play allowed-0.093

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 4–4 since 1999

Meetings average 43.9 points. WAS are 4-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W13TEN @ WAS1942WAS
2022 · W5TEN @ WAS2117TEN
2018 · W16WAS @ TEN1625TEN
2014 · W7TEN @ WAS1719WAS
2010 · W11WAS @ TEN1916WAS
2006 · W6TEN @ WAS2522TEN
2002 · W5WAS @ TEN3114WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Steve McNair14/189610

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Eddie George22713.20
Steve McNair3165.30
Rodney Thomas294.50

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Eddie George55420
Frank Wycheck57281
Derrick Mason22120
Chris Sanders12120
Rodney Thomas1120
Carl Pickens0100

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson21/4020223

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Stephen Davis21623.01
Brad Johnson11313.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Irving Fryar35550
Stephen Alexander44380
Albert Connell211330
James Thrash35200
Andre Reed12100
Mike Sellers1151
Stephen Davis1220

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +42.7%4.4%2.9%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

2.45%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

48.8%

Expected total

41.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.66
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-0.10