2006 · Week 11

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brad Johnson

20·24

Dolphins

Miami

QB Joey Harrington

Dolphin Stadium · outdoors · grass · 68°F · wind 9mph

Closing spread

MIA -3

Total

34

Model margin

+2.9est.

MIA perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Dolphins
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Dolphins winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapDolphins
  • -0.151EPA / play-0.103
  • 39.3%Success rate41.6%
  • -0.174EPA / dropback-0.081
  • -0.117EPA / rush-0.139
  • 8.0%Explosive rate7.2%
  • +1.13CPOE-1.62
  • 33.2%Third-down rate37.7%
  • 45.1%Red-zone TD rate45.8%
  • 0.99Points / drive1.19
  • 2.9%Turnover rate2.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 4–3 since 1999

MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 42.1 points. MIA are 2-5 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2022 · W6MIN @ MIA2416MIN
2018 · W15MIA @ MIN1741MIN
2014 · W16MIN @ MIA3537MIA
2010 · W2MIA @ MIN1410MIA
2002 · W16MIA @ MIN1720MIN
2000 · W2MIA @ MIN713MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson26/4426201

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chester Taylor28802.92
Brad Johnson5193.80
Mewelde Moore11414.00
Bethel Johnson111.00

Dolphins

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Joey Harrington26/4225411

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ronnie Brown1220.20
Joey Harrington2-5-2.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +33.9%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Dolphins; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

7.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

56.8%

Expected total

41.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.31
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.87