Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2008 · Week 17

Final

Giants

New York

QB Eli Manning

19·20

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Tarvaris Jackson

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

MIN -7

Total

41

Model margin

+4.8est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

4.9%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Giants

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsGiants wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Giantsedge mapVikings
  • +0.093EPA / play-0.039
  • 47.3%Success rate40.9%
  • +0.129EPA / dropback+0.001
  • +0.050EPA / rush-0.081
  • 10.1%Explosive rate9.0%
  • +0.84CPOE-2.18
  • 43.7%Third-down rate39.7%
  • 51.8%Red-zone TD rate53.5%
  • 2.09Points / drive1.59
  • 1.2%Turnover rate2.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 12–7 since 1999

MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 43.7 points. MIN are 10-9 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W16MIN @ NYG1613MIN
2024 · W1MIN @ NYG286MIN
2022 · playoffsNYG @ MIN3124NYG
2022 · W16NYG @ MIN2427MIN
2019 · W5MIN @ NYG2810MIN
2016 · W4NYG @ MIN1024MIN
2015 · W16NYG @ MIN1749MIN
2013 · W7MIN @ NYG723NYG

Box score

Individual performances

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Eli Manning11/1911900
David Carr8/1111010

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Derrick Ward15775.10
Ahmad Bradshaw10282.80
David Carr3155.00
D.J. Ware2157.50

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tarvaris Jackson16/2623911

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson211034.91
Chester Taylor4102.50
Jeff Dugan111.00
Tarvaris Jackson1-4-4.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +73.5%6.5%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%3.0%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Giants.

Half-point at risk

4.93%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

61.9%

Expected total

43.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.05
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment+1.27
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.81