Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2010 · Week 8

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brett Favre

18·28

Patriots

New England

QB Tom Brady

Gillette Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 49°F · wind 16mph

Closing spread

NE -5

Total

44.5

Model margin

+6.2est.

NE perspective

Push chance

2.0%est.

Win probability

  • Patriots
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Patriots winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapPatriots
  • -0.112EPA / play+0.191
  • 42.3%Success rate48.7%
  • -0.105EPA / dropback+0.265
  • -0.121EPA / rush+0.096
  • 9.3%Explosive rate10.2%
  • -2.30CPOE+2.77
  • 34.1%Third-down rate48.3%
  • 48.7%Red-zone TD rate65.4%
  • 1.25Points / drive2.76
  • 3.5%Turnover rate0.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

NE lead 5–2 since 1999

Meetings average 41.3 points. NE are 4-3 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2022 · W12NE @ MIN2633MIN
2018 · W13MIN @ NE1024NE
2014 · W2NE @ MIN307NE
2006 · W8NE @ MIN317NE
2002 · W12MIN @ NE1724NE
2000 · W3MIN @ NE2113MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brett Favre22/3225901
Tarvaris Jackson4/63610

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson25923.71
Tarvaris Jackson13333.00
Toby Gerhart200.00

Patriots

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tom Brady16/2724010

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
BenJarvus Green-Ellis171126.62
Danny Woodhead6132.21
Tom Brady4-3-0.80

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +53.2%6.1%7.3%3.2%5.0%3.3%3.2%

Positive margins favour Patriots; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

1.97%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

65.4%

Expected total

43.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.70
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.19