Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2010 · Week 14

Final

Giants

New York

QB Eli Manning

21·3

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Tarvaris Jackson

Ford Field · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

NYG -4.5

Total

43.5

Model margin

+2.3est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Giants

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsGiants wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Giantsedge mapVikings
  • -0.006EPA / play-0.112
  • 44.3%Success rate42.3%
  • +0.081EPA / dropback-0.105
  • -0.118EPA / rush-0.121
  • 10.7%Explosive rate9.3%
  • +2.60CPOE-2.30
  • 37.0%Third-down rate34.1%
  • 67.4%Red-zone TD rate48.7%
  • 1.81Points / drive1.25
  • 4.0%Turnover rate3.5%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 12–7 since 1999

MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 43.7 points. MIN are 10-9 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W16MIN @ NYG1613MIN
2024 · W1MIN @ NYG286MIN
2022 · playoffsNYG @ MIN3124NYG
2022 · W16NYG @ MIN2427MIN
2019 · W5MIN @ NYG2810MIN
2016 · W4NYG @ MIN1024MIN
2015 · W16NYG @ MIN1749MIN
2013 · W7MIN @ NYG723NYG

Box score

Individual performances

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Eli Manning22/3718712

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Brandon Jacobs141168.31
Ahmad Bradshaw111039.41
D.J. Ware3-6-2.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Hakeem Nicks79960
Kevin Boss49231
Bear Pascoe22210
D.J. Ware11120
Steve Smith13120
Ahmad Bradshaw56120
Derek Hagan13100
Mario Manningham1310

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tarvaris Jackson15/3011801
Joe Webb2/5800

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson14261.90
Joe Webb11616.00
Toby Gerhart3113.70
Tarvaris Jackson482.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -4.54.0%2.7%7.0%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Giants.

Half-point at risk

2.31%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

55.3%

Expected total

43.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.28
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment+1.12
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.33