2015 · Week 1

Final

Dolphins

Miami

QB Ryan Tannehill

17·10

Commanders

Washington

QB Kirk Cousins

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 69°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

MIA -4

Total

45.5

Model margin

+4.6est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

2.1%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Dolphins

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsDolphins wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Dolphinsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.032EPA / play+0.022
  • 40.5%Success rate42.6%
  • +0.008EPA / dropback+0.166
  • -0.111EPA / rush-0.191
  • 9.5%Explosive rate7.9%
  • +1.20CPOE+5.62
  • 31.0%Third-down rate43.9%
  • 65.1%Red-zone TD rate61.3%
  • 1.42Points / drive1.81
  • 1.8%Turnover rate1.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIA lead 5–3 since 1999

MIA have won 2 straight. Meetings average 35.6 points. WAS are 2-5-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11WAS @ MIA1316MIA
2023 · W13MIA @ WAS4515MIA
2019 · W6WAS @ MIA1716WAS
2011 · W10WAS @ MIA920MIA
2007 · W1MIA @ WAS1316WAS
2003 · W12WAS @ MIA2324MIA
1999 · W17MIA @ WAS1021WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Dolphins

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Ryan Tannehill22/3422610

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Lamar Miller13534.10
Jarvis Landry11414.00
Ryan Tannehill372.30
Damien Williams100.00

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kirk Cousins21/3119612

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Alfred Morris251214.80
Matt Jones6284.70
Chris Thompson3113.70
Jamison Crowder122.00
Kirk Cousins2-1-0.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -43.6%6.5%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Dolphins.

Half-point at risk

2.12%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

61.4%

Expected total

45.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.14
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.63