2015 · Week 9

Final / OT

Titans

Tennessee

QB Marcus Mariota

34·28

Saints

New Orleans

QB Drew Brees

Mercedes-Benz Superdome · dome · sportturf

Closing spread

NO -7

Total

50

Model margin

+4.6est.

NO perspective

Push chance

4.9%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Saints
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Saints winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Titansedge mapSaints
  • -0.103EPA / play+0.080
  • 41.1%Success rate44.6%
  • -0.050EPA / dropback+0.161
  • -0.200EPA / rush-0.078
  • 7.8%Explosive rate10.0%
  • +0.30CPOE+2.78
  • 32.1%Third-down rate48.9%
  • 67.5%Red-zone TD rate65.6%
  • 1.32Points / drive2.09
  • 3.0%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

TEN lead 5–4 since 1999

NO have won 2 straight. Meetings average 47.9 points. NO are 4-4-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W17NO @ TEN3426NO
2023 · W1TEN @ NO1516NO
2021 · W10NO @ TEN2123TEN
2019 · W16NO @ TEN3828NO
2011 · W14NO @ TEN2217NO
2007 · W3TEN @ NO3114TEN
2003 · W3NO @ TEN1227TEN
1999 · W6TEN @ NO2421TEN

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Marcus Mariota28/3937140

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Antonio Andrews19884.60
Dexter McCluster8192.40
Marcus Mariota155.00

Saints

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Drew Brees28/3938731

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Mark Ingram22542.50
C.J. Spiller284.00
Drew Brees3-1-0.31

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +73.6%6.5%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%3.0%

Positive margins favour Saints; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

4.91%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

61.4%

Expected total

45.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.14
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.63