Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2016 · Week 1

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

14·23

Texans

Houston

QB Brock Osweiler

NRG Stadium · closed · fieldturf

Closing spread

HOU -5.5

Total

43

Model margin

+5.2est.

HOU perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Texans
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Texans winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapTexans
  • -0.042EPA / play-0.079
  • 44.1%Success rate41.9%
  • -0.001EPA / dropback-0.029
  • -0.111EPA / rush-0.154
  • 10.0%Explosive rate6.9%
  • -0.10CPOE-3.29
  • 37.8%Third-down rate36.9%
  • 52.5%Red-zone TD rate42.0%
  • 1.41Points / drive1.45
  • 2.9%Turnover rate1.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

HOU lead 5–2 since 1999

Meetings average 36.9 points. HOU are 4-1-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W2CHI @ HOU1319HOU
2022 · W3HOU @ CHI2023CHI
2020 · W14HOU @ CHI736CHI
2012 · W10HOU @ CHI136HOU
2008 · W17CHI @ HOU2431HOU
2004 · W15HOU @ CHI245HOU

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler16/2921611

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jeremy Langford17573.41
Jay Cutler2126.00
Ka'Deem Carey144.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Alshon Jeffery461050
Eddie Royal46571
Kevin White37340
Zach Miller34140
Jeremy Langford2460
Logan Paulsen0100

Texans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brock Osweiler22/3523121

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Lamar Miller281063.80
Brock Osweiler4143.50
Alfred Blue144.00
Tyler Ervin133.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +5.53.5%6.4%7.4%3.2%4.9%3.3%3.0%

Positive margins favour Texans; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

3.19%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

62.8%

Expected total

43.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.58
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment+1.85
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+5.17