Closing spread
PIT -7
Total
49.5
Model margin
+3.0est.
PIT perspective
Push chance
4.8%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Giants
- OutJustin PughGKnee· Limited
- OutMark HerzlichLBConcussion· DNP
- OutNat BerheSConcussion· DNP
- OutOwamagbe OdighizuwaDEKnee· DNP
- QuestionableBrett JonesCCalf· Limited
- QuestionableMarshall NewhouseTKnee· Limited
Steelers
- OutDarrius Heyward-BeyWRFoot· DNP
- OutDeAngelo WilliamsRBKnee· DNP
- DNPAntonio BrownWRNot Injury Related
Win probability
- Steelers
- Giants
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.074EPA / play+0.085
- 40.8%Success rate46.0%
- -0.035EPA / dropback+0.164
- -0.142EPA / rush-0.043
- 7.3%Explosive rate10.8%
- -1.63CPOE+1.74
- 36.0%Third-down rate41.9%
- 61.2%Red-zone TD rate64.0%
- 1.46Points / drive2.24
- 2.4%Turnover rate1.7%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PIT lead 5–2 since 1999
PIT have won 4 straight. Meetings average 43.7 points. PIT are 4-3 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | NYG–PIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 30 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NYG | Q1 11:02 | 6 | 28 | Punt | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 7:31 | 7 | 46 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NYG | Q1 4:00 | 4 | 0 | Safety | 0–2 |
| PIT | Q1 3:04 | 6 | 38 | Field goal | 0–5 |
| NYG | Q1 0:04 | 12 | 57 | Turnover | 0–5 |
| PIT | Q2 8:21 | 3 | 40 | Touchdown | 0–11 |
| NYG | Q2 7:10 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 0–11 |
| PIT | Q2 6:16 | 15 | 74 | Field goal | 0–14 |
| NYG | Q2 0:24 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 0–14 |
| NYG | Q3 15:00 | 3 | -5 | Punt | 0–14 |
| PIT | Q3 13:41 | 4 | 3 | Punt | 0–14 |
| NYG | Q3 11:46 | 7 | 57 | Turnover on downs | 0–14 |
| PIT | Q3 8:54 | 4 | 14 | Turnover | 0–14 |
| NYG | Q3 7:12 | 2 | 17 | Touchdown | 7–14 |
| PIT | Q3 6:30 | 7 | 88 | Touchdown | 7–21 |
| NYG | Q3 3:09 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 7–21 |
| PIT | Q3 1:38 | 2 | -10 | Turnover | 7–21 |
| NYG | Q3 0:44 | 8 | 23 | Turnover | 7–21 |
| PIT | Q4 11:23 | 5 | 19 | Punt | 7–21 |
| NYG | Q4 8:22 | 5 | 18 | Turnover on downs | 7–21 |
| PIT | Q4 6:56 | 10 | 48 | Field goal | 7–24 |
| NYG | Q4 1:39 | 6 | 30 | Touchdown | 14–24 |
| PIT | Q4 0:26 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 14–24 |
Box score
Individual performances
Giants
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eli Manning | 24/39 | 195 | 2 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Perkins | 7 | 38 | 5.4 | 0 |
| Rashad Jennings | 6 | 19 | 3.2 | 0 |
| Eli Manning | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odell Beckham Jr. | 10 | 16 | 100 | 0 |
| Rashad Jennings | 6 | 6 | 34 | 1 |
| Will Tye | 2 | 4 | 22 | 0 |
| Sterling Shepard | 4 | 8 | 21 | 1 |
| Jerell Adams | 1 | 3 | 10 | 0 |
| Roger Lewis | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| Larry Donnell | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Steelers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Roethlisberger | 24/36 | 289 | 2 | 1 |
| Le'Veon Bell | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Le'Veon Bell | 29 | 118 | 4.1 | 0 |
| Landry Jones | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ladarius Green | 6 | 11 | 110 | 1 |
| Le'Veon Bell | 6 | 7 | 64 | 0 |
| Antonio Brown | 6 | 7 | 54 | 1 |
| Jesse James | 3 | 4 | 32 | 0 |
| Eli Rogers | 1 | 3 | 18 | 0 |
| Cobi Hamilton | 2 | 3 | 11 | 0 |
| David Johnson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Steelers; negative favour Giants.
Half-point at risk
4.79%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
57.1%
Expected total
44.0est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.02
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential+0.24
- Expected margin+3.00



