Closing spread
MIN -1
Total
45
Model margin
+0.5est.
LAC perspective
Push chance
2.1%est.
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Vikings
- OutAlexander MattisonRBAnkle· DNP
- OutJayron KearseSToe· DNP
- QuestionableOlabisi JohnsonWRQuadricep· Limited
- QuestionableXavier RhodesCBAnkle· Limited
- LimitedAdam ThielenWRHamstring
Chargers
- OutDesmond KingCBNot Injury Related
- QuestionableUchenna NwosuLBAnkle· Limited
Win probability
- Chargers
- Vikings
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.056EPA / play+0.036
- 42.1%Success rate47.3%
- +0.177EPA / dropback+0.118
- -0.082EPA / rush-0.118
- 10.7%Explosive rate9.0%
- +3.53CPOE+3.58
- 44.0%Third-down rate45.5%
- 66.9%Red-zone TD rate57.1%
- 2.31Points / drive1.99
- 1.8%Turnover rate2.8%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
MIN lead 5–4 since 1999
CHARGERS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 51.7 points. LAC are 4-5 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | MIN–LAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | Q1 15:00 | 11 | 60 | Touchdown | 6–0 |
| LAC | Q1 9:10 | 9 | 62 | Field goal | 6–3 |
| MIN | Q1 4:35 | 6 | 25 | Punt | 6–3 |
| LAC | Q1 2:12 | 2 | 7 | Turnover | 6–3 |
| MIN | Q1 1:26 | 3 | 4 | Field goal | 9–3 |
| LAC | Q2 14:57 | 10 | 75 | Touchdown | 9–10 |
| MIN | Q2 8:42 | 10 | 50 | Field goal | 12–10 |
| LAC | Q2 4:17 | 5 | 14 | Turnover | 12–10 |
| MIN | Q2 1:58 | 4 | 20 | Turnover | 12–10 |
| LAC | Q2 0:51 | 6 | 19 | Opp touchdown | 19–10 |
| LAC | Q2 0:07 | 1 | 12 | End of half | 19–10 |
| LAC | Q3 15:00 | 1 | 5 | Turnover | 19–10 |
| MIN | Q3 14:52 | 3 | 11 | Field goal | 22–10 |
| LAC | Q3 12:37 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 22–10 |
| MIN | Q3 11:09 | 6 | 32 | Field goal | 25–10 |
| LAC | Q3 7:06 | 13 | 67 | Turnover on downs | 25–10 |
| MIN | Q4 14:55 | 8 | 96 | Touchdown | 32–10 |
| LAC | Q4 10:25 | 1 | 5 | Turnover | 32–10 |
| MIN | Q4 10:17 | 3 | 10 | Touchdown | 39–10 |
| LAC | Q4 8:45 | 4 | 24 | Turnover | 39–10 |
| MIN | Q4 7:12 | 8 | 39 | Punt | 39–10 |
| LAC | Q4 4:13 | 7 | 52 | Turnover | 39–10 |
| MIN | Q4 1:48 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 39–10 |
Box score
Individual performances
Vikings
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirk Cousins | 19/25 | 207 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Boone | 13 | 56 | 4.3 | 2 |
| Dalvin Cook | 9 | 27 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Ameer Abdullah | 5 | 25 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Kirk Cousins | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 0 |
| Bisi Johnson | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Stefon Diggs | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Adam Thielen | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Sean Mannion | 3 | -3 | -1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefon Diggs | 4 | 6 | 76 | 0 |
| Kyle Rudolph | 3 | 3 | 48 | 0 |
| Adam Thielen | 3 | 3 | 27 | 0 |
| Bisi Johnson | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 |
| Dalvin Cook | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 |
| Irv Smith | 2 | 3 | 8 | 1 |
| Ameer Abdullah | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Chargers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip Rivers | 28/39 | 307 | 1 | 3 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melvin Gordon | 7 | 28 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Austin Ekeler | 7 | 19 | 2.7 | 0 |
| Justin Jackson | 5 | 15 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keenan Allen | 9 | 10 | 99 | 0 |
| Mike Williams | 4 | 9 | 71 | 1 |
| Austin Ekeler | 5 | 7 | 62 | 0 |
| Melvin Gordon | 5 | 7 | 36 | 0 |
| Hunter Henry | 2 | 2 | 29 | 0 |
| Andre Patton | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| Justin Jackson | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Vikings.
Half-point at risk
2.15%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
50.5%
Expected total
44.0est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.21
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+0.53



