2021 · Week 10

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Kirk Cousins

27·20

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Justin Herbert

SoFi Stadium · dome · matrixturf

Closing spread

LAC -3

Total

53.5

Model margin

+2.6est.

LAC perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapChargers
  • +0.018EPA / play+0.088
  • 41.6%Success rate47.4%
  • +0.102EPA / dropback+0.167
  • -0.111EPA / rush-0.075
  • 10.3%Explosive rate7.5%
  • +0.82CPOE-0.71
  • 36.6%Third-down rate45.7%
  • 67.7%Red-zone TD rate68.6%
  • 2.13Points / drive2.55
  • 1.2%Turnover rate1.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 5–4 since 1999

CHARGERS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 51.7 points. LAC are 4-5 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W8MIN @ LAC1037CHARGERS
2023 · W3LAC @ MIN2824CHARGERS
2019 · W15MIN @ LAC3910MIN
2015 · W3SD @ MIN1431MIN
2011 · W1MIN @ SD1724CHARGERS
2007 · W9SD @ MIN1735MIN
2003 · W10MIN @ SD2842CHARGERS
1999 · W12SD @ MIN2735MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kirk Cousins25/3729420

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Dalvin Cook24943.91
Alexander Mattison4164.00
Kirk Cousins4-3-0.80
Justin Jefferson1-4-4.00

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Justin Herbert20/3419511

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Austin Ekeler11444.00
Justin Herbert22211.00
Larry Rountree III5102.01
Joshua Kelley166.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Keenan Allen811980
Mike Williams46330
Josh Palmer34220
Donald Parham12170
Austin Ekeler36151
Jared Cook13100
Jalen Guyton0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +34.0%2.7%7.0%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.0%2.7%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

7.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

56.2%

Expected total

45.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.94
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.64