2020 · Week 3

Final

Panthers

Carolina

QB Teddy Bridgewater

21·16

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Justin Herbert

SoFi Stadium · dome · matrixturf

Closing spread

LAC -6

Total

43.5

Model margin

+4.8est.

LAC perspective

Push chance

3.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Panthers

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsPanthers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Panthersedge mapChargers
  • +0.019EPA / play+0.043
  • 45.8%Success rate43.8%
  • +0.075EPA / dropback+0.154
  • -0.082EPA / rush-0.141
  • 8.9%Explosive rate7.9%
  • +2.88CPOE+0.07
  • 39.5%Third-down rate45.1%
  • 58.0%Red-zone TD rate60.1%
  • 2.21Points / drive2.02
  • 2.1%Turnover rate1.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CAR lead 5–2 since 1999

Meetings average 39 points. LAC are 3-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W2LAC @ CAR263CHARGERS
2016 · W14SD @ CAR1628CAR
2012 · W15CAR @ SD317CAR
2008 · W1CAR @ SD2624CAR
2004 · W7SD @ CAR176CHARGERS
2000 · W16SD @ CAR2230CAR

Box score

Individual performances

Panthers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Teddy Bridgewater22/2823510

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Mike Davis13463.50
Reggie Bonnafon2168.00
Teddy Bridgewater2126.00
Curtis Samuel471.80

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
DJ Moore24650
Robbie Chosen55550
Mike Davis89451
Curtis Samuel44450
Seth Roberts23160
Ian Thomas1290

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Justin Herbert35/4933011

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Austin Ekeler12594.91
Joshua Kelley8435.40
Justin Herbert3155.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Keenan Allen13191321
Austin Ekeler1111840
Hunter Henry57500
Jalen Guyton23230
Mike Williams11170
K.J. Hill14150
Joshua Kelley2290
Virgil Green0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +63.5%6.5%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%3.0%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Panthers.

Half-point at risk

3.19%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

62.0%

Expected total

45.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.15
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.85