1999 · Week 1

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Randall Cunningham

17·14

Falcons

Atlanta

QB Chris Chandler

Georgia Dome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

MIN -4

Total

49

Model margin

+5.9est.

ATL perspective

Push chance

2.0%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Falcons
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Falcons winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapFalcons
  • +0.042EPA / play-0.094
  • 44.6%Success rate38.5%
  • +0.128EPA / dropback-0.017
  • -0.092EPA / rush-0.220
  • 10.9%Explosive rate7.2%
  • 44.4%Third-down rate35.1%
  • 57.8%Red-zone TD rate54.7%
  • 1.72Points / drive1.22
  • 3.4%Turnover rate3.3%
  • -0.008EPA / play allowed+0.013

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 9–6 since 1999

Meetings average 44.7 points. ATL are 6-8-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W2ATL @ MIN226ATL
2024 · W14ATL @ MIN2142MIN
2023 · W9MIN @ ATL3128MIN
2020 · W6ATL @ MIN4023ATL
2019 · W1ATL @ MIN1228MIN
2017 · W13MIN @ ATL149MIN
2015 · W12MIN @ ATL2010MIN
2014 · W4ATL @ MIN2841MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Randall Cunningham22/3318410

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Leroy Hoard12504.21
Robert Smith16472.90
Randall Cunningham3124.00
Randy Moss166.00

Falcons

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Chris Chandler17/3025810
Tony Graziani1/13200

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jamal Anderson16503.10
Chris Chandler3217.00
Byron Hanspard393.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -43.3%6.2%7.4%3.2%5.0%3.3%

Positive margins favour Falcons; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

2.01%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

64.6%

Expected total

45.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.07
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+4.40
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+5.89